承擔法律責任英語
❶ 請問如何用正確官方的英文表達 上述情況均屬事實,如有不實我願承擔一切法律責任。
I hereby certify that all the situation mentioned above correspond to reality, if there exists anything against the actual situation, I shall bear legal liability.
❷ 英語翻譯 中文是:天津萬鼎隆國際貿易有限公司 可別亂譯啊,我是刻成中英文的章,要負法律責任!
WANDINGLONG (TIANJIN) INTERNATIONAL TRADE CO.,LTD.最後有限公司的那兩個標點符號不要漏掉,那是必須格式.萬鼎隆直接漢譯就可以內.還有,刻章容的時候必須用大寫
❸ 法律英語翻譯。急!
tort law of strict liability from the United Kingdom, has now become the mainland legal scholars often use the concept. European countries have been integrated into the principles of tort law system of Liability. In recent years, the scope of strict liability for the widening trend. Strict liability is based on the absolute obligation of security breach, although when it is done to the most careful of people's attention, but any damage caused by their actions and take responsibility. Defense against strict liability is very limited, reasonable care not among them. Strict liability for abnormally dangerous most frequent activity or proct liability cases.
The essential characteristics of strict liability
(A) the fault of the non-strict liability
Strict liability is undoubtedly the responsibility of following the fault which occurred after a new milestone. It is the advent of the fault is to determine the factors responsible is no longer the ultimate basis for liability, which is concive to protecting the innocent victims and vulnerable groups.
(B) the risk of strict liability
Looking at national tort law, strict liability and risk are inevitably linked. German civil law countries, said strict liability for hazardous ty. Some scholars would risk liability and strict liability common law equivalent. Similarly in France the use of a dangerous activity as the basis of strict liability. [20] but in fact Anglo-American tort law, strict liability apply to animals in addition to causing the infringement, workers compensation, proct liability, the most unusual is for harm caused by hazardous activities.
(C) Strict Liability of
Offenders in their fault liability for damage arising in, the reason is because the liability of the perpetrator can be a moral disapproval of. However, the perpetrator of strict liability without fault, will still be liable, the attribution of the basis for intriguing. The western half of the 20th century's most influential jurists of Pond from the maintenance of social security obligations generally off, demonstrates the rationality of strict liability. He believes that since the late 19th century, the legal interests of the community rather than focus on the protection of personal interests.
(D) strict liability causality
Responsibility for the fault is the fault element of the final decision is to determine whether the establishment of the key fault liability. In the composition of the elements of strict liability, regardless of whether the offender's fault. Therefore, the causal relationship has more significance, it is the ultimate constituent elements of strict liability element. Strict liability in the causation and damage are only two elements, namely, proof of causation by the plaintiff as long as the damage to these two factors and can get relief.
(E) of strict liability Juzheng
Strict liability is based on the absolute security breach of its obligations, regardless of whether the defendant to do the ty of care to the most cautious, as long as it should be responsible for the damage occurred, if the defendant can not be reasonable to defense (and defense is very limited), you can not remove responsibility, that is part of the plaintiff's burden of proof shifted to the defendant, the plaintiff only to prove causation and damage had been sufficient.
(F) defense of strict liability in the Restrictive
1, the third behavior, animal behavior and the forces of nature cause damage can not be the defenses.
2, the victim can not be the fault of defense.
3, the victims of people, things and animals, abnormal sensitivity can be used as defense.
4, the performance of public ties as defense.
Comment on the strict liability
(A) availability: American tort law is rooted in the philosophy of pragmatism in the soil, advocating people-centered, knowledge and human experience claims can not be separated, emphasizing the unity of theory and practice. On this basis, the case law system is the empirical wisdom of judges and logical reasoning with the proct. The strict liability from the case law through evolution, widening the scope of its application, this fact itself proves the rule dynamic and practical.
(B) Transcendence: whether scholars have the responsibility of strict liability is equivalent to what different opinions, but no doubt that it goes beyond the French law "presumption of fault liability" and the German law, "dangerous ty," and broke through to abstract known for speculative and logically coherent system of civil law tort theory of barriers to a unified system to a al responsibility principle or the principle of diversity attributable to system development, and thus the world had a profound influence legislation.
(C) justice: perpetrators and victims of strict liability emphasized to achieve a balance of interests, reflecting the protection of the weak instead of the new concept of equal protection, and to achieve substantial justice. This is in the field of proct liability and workers compensation in particular stands out.
要懸賞分呀!
❹ 以上內容屬實,如有虛假,將承擔全部相關法律責任 用英語怎麼說啊各位大俠幫幫忙!感激不盡!
All above are truth, otherwise XX will bear all relevant legal liability.
❺ 英語專四考試疑泄題 泄題將承擔什麼樣的法律責任
2015年8月29日,全國人大常委會通過了《中華人民共和國刑法修正案(九)》,將考試作弊違法行為納入刑法規制范圍。《刑法修正案(九)》已於2015年11月1日正式實施,意味著在2016年國家考試中有作弊行為,將面臨刑法的制裁。
組織作弊處罰更重
《刑法修正案(九)》在刑法第284條後補充如下:「在法律規定的國家考試中,組織作弊的,處三年以下有期徒刑或者拘役,並處或者單處罰金;情節嚴重的,處三年以上七年以下有期徒刑,並處罰金。」「為他人實施前款犯罪提供作弊器材或者其他幫助的,依照前款的規定處罰。」「為實施考試作弊行為,向他人非法出售或者提供第一款規定的考試的試題、答案的,依照第一款的規定處罰。」「代替他人或者讓他人代替自己參加第一款規定的考試的,處拘役或者管制,並處或者單處罰金。」
從新法內容來看,主要規制組織作弊、為他人組織作弊提供作弊器材或其他幫助、向他人非法出售或提供試題答案、代考替考等四類行為的實施主體。其中,對於組織作弊者及向組織作弊提供便利者的處罰更重,而替考代考者則處罰較輕,體現了刑法重點打擊危害性較大的組織作弊行為。因此,本次研究生入學考試中,組織作弊者應當依據新的刑法修正案接受處罰,而對於購買考試試題、答案的考生,則應當適用其他法律規制。例如,全國人大常委會2015年12月27日通過的《中華人民共和國教育法》修正案規定,考生在國家教育考試中出現作弊行為,可由教育行政部門責令停止其參加相關國家教育考試一年以上三年以下。
❻ 由此引發的一切經濟、法律責任由我單位自行承擔英文怎麼說
NHK : The organization, XXXX, will be liable for any economic and legal liability incurred herefrom (= 這單位, XXXX, 將會承擔因此而發生的任何經濟和法律負任)~...或是寫成 The organization, XXXX, will be liable for any economic and legal consequence incurred herefrom (= 這單位, XXXX, 將會承擔因此而發生的任何經濟和法律後果)...XXXX 是你單位的名稱...為了表示承諾...應該把你單位的正式名稱...加進句子里唄~...句末的 herefrom...是英式法律用語...解作 由此 / 因此...而 liability 在商業界...1般是解作 負債...但是...在法律英語中...是解作"法定的責任"~..."一切"(= all)的意思...有時候...會比較難定義...難掌握...而且...有些法律責任...不是單位可以負擔起的...那麼...在法律英語中...通常是改用 any (= 任何)...最後..."我單位"的意義...比較虛無...是法人組織 ??...是公共組織 ??...或是私人團體 ??...偶只能...暫時以英文的 the organization (= 這組織 / 這單位)去定義...如果是"公司"的話...可以改寫成 the company...或是 the corporation...請不要寫成 "our" organization (= "我們"組織 / "我們"單位)...公司和單位...是獨立的法人團體...不應該跟"我"...或"我們"...混在1起...不然...在法理上...會有問題的...如果你這1句...是純粹用於銷售產品...給予客戶售後承諾的話...即是...不需要很嚴格的法律要求...那麼...帶1點"直譯"的方式...寫成 Our organization will be liable for any economic and legal liability incurred herefrom (= 我單位將會承擔因此而發生的任何經濟和法律負任)...也是可以接受滴~...要採用"經濟和法律責任"...還是"經濟和法律後果"...你可以自己決定喲~...1般來說..."責任 / Liability"是比較直接的損失和傷害...而"後果 / Consequence"所覆蓋...以及影響的范圍...會比較廣...再者...後果是包括了..."連鎖反應式"的責任唄~....哈哈哈嘻........
❼ 求:行政法律責任、刑事法律責任、民事法律責任 的專業英語翻譯!!!!謝謝!!急!急!
administrative liability, criminal liability, civil liability
❽ 合同總有關法律責任的英文翻譯
Party A hereby warrants that all its entrusted matters are in compliance with the laws and regulations in China. Party B hereby warrants that all its entrusted matters are in compliance with the laws and regulations in Japan. Both Party A and Party B shall be legally responsible for Party C's agent performance as provided in this Agreement.
大致復如此,制你幹活話自己潤色潤色吧
❾ 求一篇關於高空墜物傷人法律責任分析的法學英文原文,要求如下
你可以在學校資料庫上找一下,不過英語原文文獻比較少,如果有同學在國外可以讓他們幫你找一下
❿ 追究法律責任英語怎麼說
seek legal actions against somebody