承擔責任法律英語

『壹』 為什麼法律術語「責任」和「債務」對應同一個英文單詞liability

Liability專指因法律後果形成的債務,也就是民事法律責任（相對於個人借貸形成的債務debt）,因為貨幣賠償是最常見的一種民事賠償方式,所以從法律角度講這個債務等同於責任.

『貳』 一句法律英語，求准確翻譯。學位論文用，求大神們幫助。

A third was that ISPs "reap rewards for infringing activity"in the form of added subscribers and increased usages,and they should therefore "bear the responsibilities"associated with that activity.
可以學位論文用的准確翻譯：
第三種情況就是，互聯網服務供應商，通過已經增加的用戶數量和更多的使用量的形式，「因侵權活動而獲得了獎賞」，因此他們應該「承擔」與那些活動相關的「責任」。

『叄』 由此引發的一切經濟、法律責任由我單位自行承擔英文怎麼說

NHK : The organization, XXXX, will be liable for any economic and legal liability incurred herefrom (= 這單位, XXXX, 將會承擔因此而發生的任何經濟和法律負任)~...或是寫成 The organization, XXXX, will be liable for any economic and legal consequence incurred herefrom (= 這單位, XXXX, 將會承擔因此而發生的任何經濟和法律後果)...XXXX 是你單位的名稱...為了表示承諾...應該把你單位的正式名稱...加進句子里唄~...句末的 herefrom...是英式法律用語...解作 由此 / 因此...而 liability 在商業界...1般是解作 負債...但是...在法律英語中...是解作"法定的責任"~..."一切"(= all)的意思...有時候...會比較難定義...難掌握...而且...有些法律責任...不是單位可以負擔起的...那麼...在法律英語中...通常是改用 any (= 任何)...最後..."我單位"的意義...比較虛無...是法人組織 ??...是公共組織 ??...或是私人團體 ??...偶只能...暫時以英文的 the organization (= 這組織 / 這單位)去定義...如果是"公司"的話...可以改寫成 the company...或是 the corporation...請不要寫成 "our" organization (= "我們"組織 / "我們"單位)...公司和單位...是獨立的法人團體...不應該跟"我"...或"我們"...混在1起...不然...在法理上...會有問題的...如果你這1句...是純粹用於銷售產品...給予客戶售後承諾的話...即是...不需要很嚴格的法律要求...那麼...帶1點"直譯"的方式...寫成 Our organization will be liable for any economic and legal liability incurred herefrom (= 我單位將會承擔因此而發生的任何經濟和法律負任)...也是可以接受滴~...要採用"經濟和法律責任"...還是"經濟和法律後果"...你可以自己決定喲~...1般來說..."責任 / Liability"是比較直接的損失和傷害...而"後果 / Consequence"所覆蓋...以及影響的范圍...會比較廣...再者...後果是包括了..."連鎖反應式"的責任唄~....哈哈哈嘻........

『肆』 法律英語翻譯網

a person who患有may be able to use法律金錯Law to receive從某人誰是legally負責賠償金」，承擔責任」，for those損傷..torts封面intentional Acts and事故例如，愛麗絲throws球和不小心打布倫達的眼睛。布倫達May蘇愛麗絲for損失事故（例如，occasioned by the costs of medical treatment，失去的收入在時間關閉工作，麵包和痛苦，等。）whether or not布倫達贏得她如果她能證明是取決於我們tortious愛麗絲engaged in行為one of the手topics of the物質是Determining the Law of錯了「護理標准」句that means區別之間的法律行為是當金is not tortious。put another way，The Big Issue is whether a person患有the loss from his own損傷，或whether it gets transferred to別人如果它是年的事故，布倫達必須證明疏忽。要做到這一點，我要展示她的損傷是合理的Foreseeable，，愛麗絲欠布倫達ty of care not to hit her with the球，and that愛麗絲failed to meet the standard of care requiredin much of the Western World，試金石of錯責任是玩忽職守。if the injured party不能證明that the person to have caused the損傷認為做以及疏忽，at the very least，will not compensate他們錯法。錯誤的法律也承認intentional錯誤和嚴格責任，which apply to engage in一定defendants誰的行動

『伍』 在法律英語里，liable ,accountable用法有什麼區別嗎responsible>liable ,accountable

accountable主要指負有說明解釋的責任，liable則是賠償補救的責任。

下面這句話就是說這家公司需要對食物中的玻璃片這件事情作出解釋，如果換成liable則是需要承擔賠償補救的責任。

『陸』 我公司願為此承擔相應的法律責任 英文怎麼說

My company is willing to undertake the relative legal obligations and liabilities of the document loss

『柒』 翻譯一句，關於賠償的法律英語

此外，來這種情況下，自賣方應對買方承擔違約責任：賣方應向買方支付相當於合同價格 10 %的違約金；
Furthermore,in this case, the Seller shall shoulder its responsibility for breaking the Contract as following: the Seller should pay the Buyer 10 % of the total value of the Contract as breach penalty.

『捌』 法律英語翻譯。急！

tort law of strict liability from the United Kingdom, has now become the mainland legal scholars often use the concept. European countries have been integrated into the principles of tort law system of Liability. In recent years, the scope of strict liability for the widening trend. Strict liability is based on the absolute obligation of security breach, although when it is done to the most careful of people's attention, but any damage caused by their actions and take responsibility. Defense against strict liability is very limited, reasonable care not among them. Strict liability for abnormally dangerous most frequent activity or proct liability cases.
The essential characteristics of strict liability
(A) the fault of the non-strict liability
Strict liability is undoubtedly the responsibility of following the fault which occurred after a new milestone. It is the advent of the fault is to determine the factors responsible is no longer the ultimate basis for liability, which is concive to protecting the innocent victims and vulnerable groups.
(B) the risk of strict liability
Looking at national tort law, strict liability and risk are inevitably linked. German civil law countries, said strict liability for hazardous ty. Some scholars would risk liability and strict liability common law equivalent. Similarly in France the use of a dangerous activity as the basis of strict liability. [20] but in fact Anglo-American tort law, strict liability apply to animals in addition to causing the infringement, workers compensation, proct liability, the most unusual is for harm caused by hazardous activities.
(C) Strict Liability of
Offenders in their fault liability for damage arising in, the reason is because the liability of the perpetrator can be a moral disapproval of. However, the perpetrator of strict liability without fault, will still be liable, the attribution of the basis for intriguing. The western half of the 20th century's most influential jurists of Pond from the maintenance of social security obligations generally off, demonstrates the rationality of strict liability. He believes that since the late 19th century, the legal interests of the community rather than focus on the protection of personal interests.
(D) strict liability causality
Responsibility for the fault is the fault element of the final decision is to determine whether the establishment of the key fault liability. In the composition of the elements of strict liability, regardless of whether the offender's fault. Therefore, the causal relationship has more significance, it is the ultimate constituent elements of strict liability element. Strict liability in the causation and damage are only two elements, namely, proof of causation by the plaintiff as long as the damage to these two factors and can get relief.
(E) of strict liability Juzheng
Strict liability is based on the absolute security breach of its obligations, regardless of whether the defendant to do the ty of care to the most cautious, as long as it should be responsible for the damage occurred, if the defendant can not be reasonable to defense (and defense is very limited), you can not remove responsibility, that is part of the plaintiff's burden of proof shifted to the defendant, the plaintiff only to prove causation and damage had been sufficient.
(F) defense of strict liability in the Restrictive
1, the third behavior, animal behavior and the forces of nature cause damage can not be the defenses.
2, the victim can not be the fault of defense.
3, the victims of people, things and animals, abnormal sensitivity can be used as defense.
4, the performance of public ties as defense.
Comment on the strict liability
(A) availability: American tort law is rooted in the philosophy of pragmatism in the soil, advocating people-centered, knowledge and human experience claims can not be separated, emphasizing the unity of theory and practice. On this basis, the case law system is the empirical wisdom of judges and logical reasoning with the proct. The strict liability from the case law through evolution, widening the scope of its application, this fact itself proves the rule dynamic and practical.
(B) Transcendence: whether scholars have the responsibility of strict liability is equivalent to what different opinions, but no doubt that it goes beyond the French law "presumption of fault liability" and the German law, "dangerous ty," and broke through to abstract known for speculative and logically coherent system of civil law tort theory of barriers to a unified system to a al responsibility principle or the principle of diversity attributable to system development, and thus the world had a profound influence legislation.
(C) justice: perpetrators and victims of strict liability emphasized to achieve a balance of interests, reflecting the protection of the weak instead of the new concept of equal protection, and to achieve substantial justice. This is in the field of proct liability and workers compensation in particular stands out.
要懸賞分呀！

『玖』 法律責任的英文

legal responsibility
法律責任

政府即使沒有法律責任，在道義上也有責任來賠償。內
The Government had a moral, if not a legal ty to pay compensation.

當局負有逮捕容所有疑犯的法律責任。
The authorities will be legally bound to arrest any suspects.

結合了公司的法律責任的保障和自由通過稅收結構的夥伴關系。
Combines a corporation's liability protection and pass-through tax structure of a partnership.

『拾』 合同總有關法律責任的英文翻譯

Party A hereby warrants that all its entrusted matters are in compliance with the laws and regulations in China. Party B hereby warrants that all its entrusted matters are in compliance with the laws and regulations in Japan. Both Party A and Party B shall be legally responsible for Party C's agent performance as provided in this Agreement.

大致復如此，制你幹活話自己潤色潤色吧