英語法學論文

㈠ 法律方面的英語論文

The theory of criminal law of shallow understanding errors
1. irrtumslehre
Legal irrtumslehre, namely, refers to the illegality mistake for own behavior in law, whether what crime constitutes a crime shall be punished by, or what is wrong, is to oneself the legal nature of the action of meaning or misunderstandings. Legal irrtumslehre usually includes three conditions: (1) the actor's behavior in law does not constitute a crime, the offender and constitutes a crime for which imaginary guilty, (2) the behavior in law constitutes a crime and does not constitute a crime, the offender mistaken assumptions that innocent, (3) for his act constitutes a crime shall be convicted and punishment in light of the existing errors, misunderstanding or punishment. Due to the legal irrtumslehre, only to the behavior of the offender is not correct understanding of the legal assessment, and for their actions in fact correct understanding of the situation is still there, so its act constitutes a crime shall be investigated for criminal responsibility is and how it is not usually occurs.
（1）Imaginary innocent treatment principle
The principles for imaginary innocence, whether it involves a deliberately elements. Foreign criminal law theory basically has the following kinds:
1）Should know that don't speak, just for criminal facts have understanding. Canada criminal code article 19 regulation: "the ignorance of the law excuses and crime can be ShuZui reason." Motto: "Roman law and legal disclaimer" somehow also expressed a principle, namely: "in the crime as subjective FanYi established condition, not request to recognize his behavior of richtswitrig".
2）Should know the reason, according to two: moral responsibility theory, personality responsibility theory. Moral responsibility theory emphasizes on the rationality of free will blame illegal conct, is considered to be objective stance.
3）That said, the possible illegality of responsibility for deliberately, at least to the possibility of understanding illegality. While in China mainland, the introction of the concept of crime has another concept -- social consciousness that harm to discuss richtswitrig already meaningless. Because the deliberate crime according to law condemn the illegality of the offender is not known, the law itself is not damaged, the law of the social consciousness is harm. Social harm consciousness is the essential contents of the crime, illegal consciousness is the legal form of social consciousness. Therefore, our country law more emphasis is on the rationality of essence, which is harmful to the society values.
Just because of its social harmfulness, with a social moral evaluation colour, easier for people to grasp and observe. Therefore, the author thinks that, in general, the person need to recognize his behavior may be the result of inevitable or harmful to the society, and has already know. With intentionally But in fact, the forbidden by law and mass that is harmful to the society in our country nowadays the behavior under the constitution should be consistent, in other words, know the social harmfulness also know the possibility of illegal, but know the possibility of illegal is inevitable should also realize social harmfulness, both are unified. Therefore, it is generally thought that the law is no excuse, the reason of law does not exclude the misunderstanding in principle, but can be culpable for deliberately discretion.
（2） Misunderstandings treatment principle. Punishment
We might as well so the essence of blame for his e: the crime in the subjective should blame or blame, for the intent or negligence performance. If the offender because of misunderstanding that legal person feels very innocent, lack of this should blame or condemning sexual, from the fundamental measure, blame is absolutely not consider disclaimer. Especially in the modern society, the legal category SAN marino, legal entry in different fields and different levels of books, recognized, comprehend legal apparently endless and same, so the person of law and misunderstandings, not inexcusable. Now, both in theory and practice, the method not cling to forgive "seems to have in shake. Therefore, to a certain extent, can also think admits exceptions excusable is legal misunderstanding of criminal law is an important symbol of humanity. In addition, it was not in the act of which is prohibited by the laws and regulations, especially after a circumstance, should have knowledge of richtswitrig actor, constitute the understanding of deliberate point of view, with the attitude of this understanding, of course, that is not the illegality or by the simple statement actor. The author thinks that the only when the legal establishment of may, FangKeZu but intentionally.
2. The fact mistake
That mistake, is to determine its subjective behavior nature and the criminal responsibility of the relevant facts wrong understanding. From the wrong reasons and phenomenon of angles, generally known that there are several mistakes:
（1） Object irrtumslehre
The object is known for errors, whether there is objectively error object. It includes actor in the implementation of the existing criminal behavior of the hazards for the object and actually does not exist, or for criminal object and actually does not exist, or infringe a criminal object and actually invaded another crime object. The object of objects is usually known errors caused by mistake, but the object of different social relationship reflects different. Evil doer of objects and actual expected in fact not only harm object does not agree, and in the nature of law is not consistent. Therefore, the object irrtumslehre may affect the form of sin, crime accomplishment, and may even attempted to influence the crime. For example, in view of the circumstances, not a thought before the enemy, and a party came to stick, afterwards just know the ox was wounded. A thought of damage is "people", and the actual wounded is "cow", do not belong to the same laws of the object. Similar situation and will generally be mistaken for drug trafficking items, Actor will stolen items in the theft of guns in stealing together. This object from the subjective errors, see, is a kind of mistake, From the objective, because the mistake crime to no avail, where the criminal attempted belongs.
1）Object mistake
Objects can be generalized mistake, including object mistake to belong to the object know mistake is inevitable object irrtumslehre. These include, is known to be wrong object of legal property of the same object mistake and legal properties of different objects, namely the object irrtumslehre irrtumslehre. In order to distinguish with the object mistake here, the cognition to the same object only mean error between the different objects, namely the misunderstanding of the evil doer expected objects and actual harm to the object, but not in fact in the legal nature of the same situation. This object mistake again say things on purpose mistake not criminal responsibility. As a reserve, killing b shall be killed as b and c, do not affect a rap. This is the need to consider that a kill b behavior "mistake" cause others (c), belong to an intentional crime (b) "death", for the excess result, according to the results, which determine the ordinary mail of death was deliberately recognized for deliberately, to the death of the fault is propylene, identified as negligence, according to the intention or negligence of the general mark recognized FanYi or state of mind, not applicable rules of the mistake.
2） Behavior irrtumslehre
Behavior mainly includes two kind of mistake: first, the behavior nature irrtumslehre. That actor has to its social harm nature, such as understanding not imaginary defense. Behavior nature mistake might affect the form of sin, and may also affect crime. Second, the behavior tools (methods) irrtumslehre. That person to use when the conct of tool (methods), which affects not correct understanding of harm results, behavior tools (methods) mistake can affect crime or attempted was founded, also can affect crime or belongs to the incident, a typical for murder on hazardous substances, because the drug failure and failed to kill people, can think method or tools for error doer of consciousness beyond reason not to succeed. And as actor see armour, second coming together, hence shot to play, but can't hit by the party and. Look, this is from the phenomenon of an object, or the final results for the mistake, but this error is based on the fact that the wrong doer identify offender is carefully identify to begin, can think recognize is accurate, errors in ChaWu itself. The solution to this situation, "said", its legal with qualitative and recognize wrong object is consistent, namely directly recognized as an intentional homicide accomplishment. The death of a person is directly intentionally to b, death is the indirect intentional, just for a to b is attempted, accomplished. Additionally, if in daily life because misidentification object and damage of consequences, the crime itself is not just any criminal negligence because of problems.
3)Causality irrtumslehre
Causality mistake, is on his behavior and harmful results of actual connection between errors. Generally include: first, not some harm result, as has happened actor. This generally constitute a crime. Second, has certain harm result, but not for actor or for his behavior is caused, and does not affect crime accomplishment. Third, really happened, the offender is aware of its behavior, but with the actual development between the harm to the process or a mistake, general to punish crime accomplishment. In theory, the offender is not only a crime, but continuous movement, this several continuous action is not a few crime, but a crime. In this sense, doesn't exist on the results of the sack.
3.Legal irrtumslehre and facts mistake and proceres
Domestic scholars in fact know mistakes and errors between the issue legal representative views mainly include:
（1）For own behavior whether in law constitutes a crime, criminal or what kind of criminal punishment shall be under the incorrect understanding is legal irrtumslehre for his behavior on the implementation of the incorrect understanding is the fact that mistake,
（2）The objectivity of crime is a false understanding of crime, that mistake of objective facts have clear understanding, only to act in the evaluation of existing laws on the concept of law is not correct mistakes。
（3）Actor known facts and actual fact don't agree is wrong, the person that judgment and objective law is law of illegal inconsistency errors.
These ideas basically could in theory and legal irrtumslehre fact distinguish mistakes, it is important to emphasize that：
1) With the conviction that the so-called irrelevant, as this mistake to hit each other, the shooting head caused the death of heart, without vision of research into our.
2) Study of the theory of error, error occurs when the purpose, but whether to intentionally resistance, rece plots affected only the wrong cognition, natural sentencing nor will it into the error theory category.
3) This does not constitute a crime and actor for crime, and for their behavior in the criminal law on the crimes and how to apply for criminal punishment on such specific knowledge error, conviction according to law. Based on this, the author thinks that, at the fact that criminal law is only to know wrong doer of elements to know the so-called objective facts constituents of mistake is the fact that the legal irrtumslehre error refers to the legal action is illegal and the evaluation of the mistake. From the theory of facts and legal irrtumslehre error, but the problem is in the law, criminal elements to the facts and law closely combined circumstances (like some administrative crimes and economic crimes), or is in a fact itself contains certain laws of evaluation content, to distinguish with a mistake is the fact that mistake or legal wrong, is often difficult. If the property of his humanity and obscenity obscenity, administrative rules and regulations, JinYuOu, disrupt public until its precondition of the legitimacy of the public, and legal irrtumslehre facts wrong intertwined, and this is what we distinguish facts and legal irrtumslehre errors will solve the problem.
In some cases, the defendant should know that because of the lack of knowledge, and not to the behavior of social harmfulness, so that the defendant is not "knowledge they will entail harmful consequences to society, and hope or allows such results" and deliberate crime, the burden of proof is only FanYi prosecution, in addition, prosecution without proof the defendant not normal, but normal mental and spiritual normal presumption defendant directly if the defendant that his spirit is not normal, it shall provide necessary evidence by himself to prove. Thus, the author, on legal irrtumslehre processing, can adopt the presumption of ways to handle. Which country presumption every normal citizens are known, unless the law can put forward defense "advantage prove" above, or the evidence rebut these presumption is established. From the efficiency of lawsuit, said the country is impossible to prove the defendant is known of the law.

㈡ 有沒有法學 或者英語 的畢業論文題目推薦

結構嚴謹，表達簡明，語義確切。摘要先寫什麼，後寫什麼，要按邏輯順序來安排。
句子之間要上下連貫，互相呼應。摘要慎用長句，句型應力求簡單。
每句話要表意明白，無空泛、籠統、含混之詞，但摘要畢竟是一篇完整的短文，電報式的寫法亦不足取。摘要不分段。

㈢ 求一篇跟法律有關的英語文章（論文之類的）6000字左右

那時的我，會寫的；來了；；有的
按照學校論文要求的格式 進行標注一下就行了啊

㈣ 法律專業英語論文,好難啊，求高手

英語類的文章可以找VIP英語論文有比較專業的老師可以幫忙的哦，之前也是很糾結，自己寫不出來，還要找很多資料，麻煩的要死，最後在他們那裡了解決了，覺得還可以的

㈤ 急求一篇關於法學知識的英語論文。最好加上英語句子翻譯！謝謝啦~

你這篇中國知網也好
萬方數據也好都有例子！
甚至網路文庫都有！
==================論文寫作方法===========================
論文網上沒有免費的，與其花人民幣，還不如自己寫，萬一碰到騙人的，就...【每天都有】
寫作論文的簡單方法，首先大概確定自己的選題，然後在網上查找幾份類似的文章!
通讀類似的文章，對這方面的內容有個大概的了解！
參照論文的格式，列出提綱，補充內容，實在不會，把這幾份論文綜合一下
從每篇論文上復制一部分，組成一篇新的文章！
然後把按自己的語言把每一部分換下句式或詞，經過換詞不換意的辦法處理後,網上就查不到了
祝你順利完成論文!

㈥ 請高手幫我把法學論文的摘要翻譯成英文。最好是法學專業的高手.。十分感謝！急！在線等！

審級制度作為司法制度的重要組成部分，對整個司法體系的運行起著至關重要的作用。
Case-hearing level system, as an important part of the judicial system for the whole judicial system, running plays a vital role.

長期以來我國的刑事審級制度一直堅持的是單一的兩審終審制，隨著我國社會生活的飛速發展,我國刑事審級制度設計上的不合理以及實際運行中的不規范，在實踐中產生了許多問題，兩審終審制在實踐中已經暴露出了越來越多的缺陷，因此,對我國的刑事審級制度有必要從理論上進行反思, 並借鑒其他國家的成熟經驗對其進行完善，最終確立有選擇的三審終審制度。
Long-term since China's criminal case-hearing level system has always insisted on a single system in China's social life ZhongShenZhi, along with the rapid development of our country's criminal case-hearing level system design and practical operation of the unreasonable the is not standard, in practice, the system has proced many problems in practice ZhongShenZhi has exposed the defects, so more and more on our criminal case-hearing level system is necessary to rethink theoretically, and drawing lessons from the experience of other countries for its perfect mature, finally established the system of SanShen of choice.

㈦ 法律英語畢業論文

跟你是一個專業的，之前我也在為論文苦惱了半天，網上的範文和能搜到的資料，大都不全面，一般能有個正文就不錯了，開題報告、中期報告什麼的都沒有，關鍵是沒有數據和分析部分，我好不容易搞出來一篇，結果老師說太簡單。還好後來找到品學論文網，直接讓老師輔導我寫作，非常專業，核心的部分幫我搞定了，也給了很多參考文獻資料。哎，專業的事還是要找專業的人來做啊，建議有問題參考下品學論文網吧

㈧ 求法律論文摘要英文翻譯

Indivial income tax on the income as a burden ability of how to obtain personal standards, is the taxable income. It is not only an important source of national revenue, but also an important tool for adjusting income distribution. Under the market economy system, various economic elements coexist, distribution in various forms and widening gap between social members, and graally formed a high income groups. High income groups income, income channels more concealed forms, in addition to the high-income group of the tax collection, inadequate makes high income groups of indivial income tax amount is huge loss, most of the wealth of society and no high-income group mainly tax liability. It is not only the loss caused by national finance income, and restrict the inequality indivial income tax adjustment, which plays an important role in the sustainable social and economic, healthy and stable development, the social harmony and stability. Based on the principles of fairness, tax evasion is based on our high earners the actual situation of personal income tax on our high earners, personal income tax erosion problems and countermeasures are analyzed and discussed.
The paper has divided into five parts, the introction section is firstly analyzed the form of personal income, and through the typical case raises problems of high earners tax evasion. The second part analyzes the loss of indivial income tax of high earners, including high income groups, analyzes the definition of the indivial income tax evasion is high earners means and the reasons for the loss. The third part of fairness and efficiency from the Angle of the system, analyzes the interpretation of the personal income tax system. The fourth part of the tax reform in Russia is introced and the management of the loss of tax law high earners, summarizes the countermeasures to control the loss of tax foreign successful experience. The fifth part in high earners and puts forward the legal countermeasures to tax erosion problems. First to see tax reform should be comprehensive and profound reform, should not be simple, then to entwine cost dections for tax justice principles, current taxation mode of relevant legal countermeasures.

㈨ 求法律論文的英語摘要！急！謝謝各位了！

The emergence of the institution of compensation for mental injury indicates the development of social civilization development has reached a new level. With the development of society, the increasingly rich material life, people pay more attention to the spirit realm of life, civil main body their personal rights are infringed upon by requiring the infringer remedies by property compensation civil legal system has been the world wide approval, at present our country's spiritual damage compensation system is still exists serious defects, based on the concept of the institution of compensation for mental injury, scope and some legal provisions in China was analyzed, institution of compensation for mental injury problems and to perfect the institution of compensation for mental injury provide constructability Suggestions, making it a better protection of the legal rights of the parties.

Keywords: Spiritual damage compensation Legislative defects
perfect State compensation

㈩ 英語論文"法律面前人人平等"

按研究的學科，可將學術論文分為自然科學論文和社會科學論文。每類又可按各自的門類分下去。如社會科學論文，又可細分為文學、歷史、哲學、教育、政治等學科論文。

按研究的內容，可將學術論文分為理論研究論文和應用研究論文。理論研究，重在對各學科的基本概念和基本原理的研究；應用研究，側重於如何將各學科的知識轉化為專業技術和生產技術，直接服務於社會。

按寫作目的，可將學術論文分為交流性論文和考核性論文。交流性論文，目的只在於專業工作者進行學術探討，發表各家之言，以顯示各們學科發展的新態勢；考核性論文，目的在於檢驗學術水平，成為有關專業人員升遷晉級的重要依據。