法學外文文獻
Ⅰ 法學外文文獻
A contract is illegal if either its formation or its performance is contrary to the public interest and to public policy. In general, illegal contracts are void. While there is a wide variety of situation which may proce illegal contracts, the discussion in this lesson will focus on three broad categories of such contracts: (1) contracts in violation of positive law, (2) contracts expressly made void by statute, and (3) contracts contrary to public policy.
1. Contracts in violation of positive law. A contract which provides for the commission of a crime or whose nature tends to ince the commission of a crime is illegal. Similarly, a contract which cannot be performed without the commission of a tort is illegal; however, the fact that a tort is committed ring the performance of a contract does not in itself make the contract illegal.
2. Contracts made illegal by statutes. Statutes which expressly deal with the legality of certain types of contracts may be divided into three groups: (1) criminal statutes, (2) statutes expressly declaring contracts void, and (3) regulatory statutes. Statutes commonly have statutes which either prohibit or regulate wagering. Generally, wagering contracts are illegal and will not be enforced. Wagering contracts should be distinguished from contracts to shift a risk. In a wagering contract, a risk is created for the purpose of bearing it---such as a bet on a football game. A risk-shifting contract---such as an insurance contract---is legal so long as the person purporting to shift the risk actually had the risk. Stock and commodity market transaction entered into in good faith are speculative contracts and not illegal as wagers.
Some common example of statutes declaring certain types of contracts illegal are usury laws and Sunday closing or blue laws. These statutes often make the contracts void and may subject the parties involved to various penalties and forfeitures.
Ⅱ 請各位高手幫忙找一篇法學相關的外文文獻，中英文都有的最好！在下感激不盡
外文文獻有，翻譯沒有，翻譯得靠你自己了，如果需要直接網路Hi中留言同時貼出問題的鏈接地址和郵箱地址即可，希望能滿足你的需要，能幫到你，並請及時知道評價，多多給點懸賞分吧，急用的話請多選賞點分吧，這樣更多的知友才會及時幫到你，我找到也是很花時間的，並請及時採納
Ⅲ 法學 英文 文獻
法律文獻主要的資料庫有Heinonline，Westlaw，LexisNexis。如果你在學校，你們學校也購買了這些資料庫專，進入這些資料庫，搜索關鍵屬詞就好。
另外，一個最簡單的方法就是用Google Scholar，輸入關鍵詞，就能搜到文獻，好多都是這些資料庫里的，所以還是需要有購買才能下載。
Ⅳ 求法學外文文獻
去WESTLAW上查
Ⅳ 關於法理學的外文參考文獻有誰知道啊我需要一篇。最好是有譯文的。
第一編參考文獻
7．[德]考夫曼、哈斯默爾主編．當代法哲學和法律理論導論．北京：法律出版社，2002．
8．[美]博登海默．法理學——法律哲學與法律方法．北京：中國政法大學出版社，1999．
9．[美]波斯納．法理學問題．北京：中國政法大學出版社，2001．
第二編參考文獻
．
7．[英]哈特．法律的概念．北京：中國大網路全書出版社，1996．
8．[奧]凱爾森．法與國家的一般理論．北京：中國大網路全書出版社，1996．
9．[美]博登海默．法理學——法律哲學與法律方法．北京：中國政法大學出版社，1999．
10．[美]德沃金．認真對待權利．北京：中國大網路全書出版社，1998．
11．[美]L.亨金．權利的時代．北京：知識出版社，1997．
12．[美]貝勒斯．法律的原則．北京：中國大網路全書出版社，1996．
13．[日]谷口安平．程序的正義與訴訟．北京：中國政法大學出版社，1996．
14．[英]哈特．懲罰與責任．北京：華夏出版社，1989．
第三編參考文獻
6．[德]馬克思．摩爾根《古代社會》一書摘要．北京：人民出版社，1965．
7．[美]霍貝爾．原始人的法．貴陽：貴州人民出版社，1992．
8．[英]梅因．古代法．北京：商務印書館，1959．
9．[日]川島武宜．現代化與法．北京：中國政法大學出版社，1994．
第四編參考文獻
．
20．[德]拉倫茲．法學方法論．五南圖書出版公司(台灣)，1996．
21．[德]邁耶．德國行政法．北京：商務印書館，2002．
22．[日]大木雅夫．比較法．北京：法律出版社，1999．
23．[美]博登海默．法理學——法律哲學與法律方法．北京：中國政法大學出版社，1999．
第五編參考文獻
10．[美]龐德．通過法律的社會控制 法律的任務．北京：商務印書館，1984．
11．[英]斯坦、香德．西方社會的法律價值．北京：中國人民公安大學出版社，1990．
12．[英]米爾恩．人的權利與人的多樣性——人權哲學．北京：中國大網路全書出版社，1995．
13．[英]密爾．論自由．北京：商務印書館，1986．
14．[英]洛克．政府論（上、下篇）．北京：商務印書館，1964．
15．[法]孟德斯鳩．論法的精神（上、下冊）．北京：商務印書館，1963．
16．[美]博登海默．法理學——法律哲學與法律方法．北京：中國政法大學出版社，1999．
17．[美]羅爾斯．正義論．北京：中國社會科學出版社，1988．
18．[美]麥金太爾．誰之正義？何種合理性？．北京：當代中國出版社，1996．
19．[美]科斯．企業、市場和法律．上海：上海三聯書店，1990．
20．[美]波斯納．法律的經濟分析（上、下）．北京：中國大網路全書出版社，1997．
第六編參考文獻
12．[法]孟德斯鳩．論法的精神（上、下冊）．北京：商務印書館，1963．
13．[美]伯爾曼．法律與宗教．北京：三聯書店，1991．
14．[美]龐德．法律史解釋．北京：中國法制出版社，2002．
15．[英]科特威爾．法律社會學導論．北京：華夏出版社，1989．
這是關於法理學的一些外文參考文獻,我不知道你要的是文章還是一些書,這此就是書了
Ⅵ 寫論文需要外文法學文獻中英對照
這個我們也做過。很麻煩，因為即使能夠翻譯，英語文字輸入也是件大工程。
我們大多是這樣做的。外文文獻直接選擇外國法條，比如寫民商法的，去把論文中提到過的外國法找出來，在網路上很容易找到這些法條的電子版，然後就復制粘貼了。至於中文嘛，網上有時也能找到現成的，不行的話就去圖書館，然後做成搞的文字輸入工作，這總比輸入英文好受些。所以你選取的法條就很重要，要符合上述條件。我當年選的是美國行政程序法。
希望對你有用！
Ⅶ 法學外文文獻中「Ga. Ct. App」代表的是什麼（內有描述）
GA= Georgia. CT= Court. APP= Appeal
Ⅷ 急求2篇法學畢業論文的外文文獻！！
2篇法學畢業
我。
這邊，
，給
您，，做，，成的，來哦。，
可以，
Ⅸ 求助~~法律外文文獻
A contract is illegal if either its formation or its performance is contrary to the public interest and to public policy. In general, illegal contracts are void. While there is a wide variety of situation which may proce illegal contracts, the discussion in this lesson will focus on three broad categories of such contracts: (1) contracts in violation of positive law, (2) contracts expressly made void by statute, and (3) contracts contrary to public policy.
1. Contracts in violation of positive law. A contract which provides for the commission of a crime or whose nature tends to ince the commission of a crime is illegal. Similarly, a contract which cannot be performed without the commission of a tort is illegal; however, the fact that a tort is committed ring the performance of a contract does not in itself make the contract illegal.
2. Contracts made illegal by statutes. Statutes which expressly deal with the legality of certain types of contracts may be divided into three groups: (1) criminal statutes, (2) statutes expressly declaring contracts void, and (3) regulatory statutes. Statutes commonly have statutes which either prohibit or regulate wagering. Generally, wagering contracts are illegal and will not be enforced. Wagering contracts should be distinguished from contracts to shift a risk. In a wagering contract, a risk is created for the purpose of bearing it---such as a bet on a football game. A risk-shifting contract---such as an insurance contract---is legal so long as the person purporting to shift the risk actually had the risk. Stock and commodity market transaction entered into in good faith are speculative contracts and not illegal as wagers.
Some common example of statutes declaring certain types of contracts illegal are usury laws and Sunday closing or blue laws. These statutes often make the contracts void and may subject the parties involved to various penalties and forfeitures.
In order to protect the public, states have enacted a wide variety of statutes regulating the conct of various types of businesses and professions. The most common type of regulation provides for the obtaining of a license before a person, partnership, or corporation engages in a regulated activity such as the practice of law or medicine or the carrying on of a trade such as barbering or plumbing. If a person contracts to perform such a service or engages in a regulated business without first having obtained the required license, any contracts he makes are illegal. Again, however, a distinction must be made between regulatory statutes which require proof of skill and character before the issuance of a license, and those statutes designed to raise revenue and which permit the issuance of a license to anyone who pays a certain, often substantial, fee. The failure to obtain a license required by a revenue-raising statute does not affect the legality of a contract made by the unlicensed person.
Ⅹ 求憲法學與行政法學方面的權威外文文獻或學者，懂的進~
一般很有名的抄英文論著襲都已經基本翻譯出版，找一兩本來看一下就可以了，比如商務印書館的公法名著譯叢。
如果找近幾年的英文文獻，到哈佛法律評論或者耶魯法學雜志等網站，提供近五年的全文下載。裡面有不少行政法憲法方面的論文。