法律英語中國公司法

❶ 學習法律英語的網站

推薦兩個實用的法律英語學習微信公眾號：
一個是「LEC法律英語考試資訊」：這個平台分享LEC考試的最新動態，更重要的是，推送很多法律英語知識，還有真題解析。
第二個是「法律英語教學與測試」：這個平台推送的文章偏學術性，是系統了解美國法律的不錯資源。

❷ 法律英語翻譯

對於這些原則來說存在著一些例外。比如：在特殊的環境下，股東可能需要在其持股范圍之外承擔一定的個人責任。貸方可能會要求股東為公司提供個人擔保，以延長公司的貸款期限。同時，在一些組織緊密的公司里，股東會同意繼續經營，因此會受到股票變現的限制。

之所以設計這種股東受限債務規則，是為了保護法人債權人的利益。比方說，設立者可以只是遵循成文法所規定的程序來設立一家公司，而這些法令規定了一家公司得以存續的條件。同樣的，公司的財產要受到這些保護債權人規則的支配和限制。所以，公司法一般會規定設立公司所需要向公司注入的最低限度的資本，而每一股東都向公司注入一定的資產，從而獲得分紅的資格。因此，在公司盈餘已不足規定的最低限額資本時，股東是不能從公司經營中分紅的。

❸ 學習法律英語，哪裡找法條官方譯文

http://www.npc.gov.cn/englishnpc/Law/Frameset-index.html
全國人大的官網

❹ 法律英語

您既然是英語專業的同學，優勢自不必說。劣勢在於對於法律體系不熟悉。「想往法律英語翻譯之類的方向發展」的話，個人覺得必須熟稔法律，然後才能得心應手，所以「在法律英語的教材選擇應充分考慮到法律英語是專業英語以及中國法律體系屬於大陸法系的特點。從文體來講，應包括法律條文、法律著作、法庭審理與辯護、司法文書寫作以及案例分析等；從內容與結構來講，應依次包括法律英語語言特點的分析及法律英語的中英互譯技巧、英美法系與大陸法系的比較、英美律師職業介紹、英美主要部門法、國際經貿法律以及中國基本法律制度等。」
推薦課外閱讀材料

教材類：
1．沙麗金：《研究生英語教程——法律英語分冊》，中國政法大學出版社，2001。
2．何家弘：《法律英語》，法律出版社，2003年4月第一版。
3．齊筠： 《法律英語》，高等教育出版社，2005年。
4．董世忠、趙建：《法律英語》，復旦大學出版社，1997。
5．陳慶柏：《涉外經濟法律英語》，法律出版社，1995。
6．杜金榜、張新紅：《法律英語核心教程》，對外經濟貿易大學出版社，2002。
7．陳莉萍，專門用途英語研究[M]. 上海：復旦大學出版社,2000。
8．楊穎浩，略論英美法律語言中的求同型近義詞，上海科技翻譯，1998，（4）。

專著類：
1. 孟德斯鳩，《論法的精神》，北京:商務印書館,2004年版

梅因，《古代法》，北京:商務印書館,1996年版
伯納德•施瓦茨，《美國法律史》，中國政法大學出版社，1990年版
4. [法]達維德，《當代主要法律體系》，漆竹生譯，上海譯文出版社1984年版

邵景春著《歐洲聯盟的法律與制度》，人民法院出版社，1999年版
郭成偉著《外國法系精神》，北京: 中國政法大學出版社,2001版
[德]馬迪亞斯·赫蒂根著《歐洲法》（張恩民譯），法律出版社，2003年版
8. 潘維大等編:《英美法導讀》,法律出版社2000年版

9. 潘國和, 《中外法學教育比較研究》,上海:華東師范大學出版社,1992年版

10. 戴維•S•克拉克，《美國法律概論》，中信出版社，2003年版

11. 麥高偉，傑弗里•威爾遜，《英國刑事司法程序》，法律出版社，2003年版

12. 麥克爾•H•格萊姆，《聯邦證據法》（美國法精要），法律出版社，1999年版

13. 卞建林等，《外國刑事訴訟法》，人民法院出版社/中國社會科學出版社，2002年版

14. 傑羅德•H•以茲瑞等，《刑事程序法》（美國法精要），法律出版社，1999年版

15. 《民事程序法》（美國法精要），法律出版社，1999年版

16. 《侵權法》（美國法精要），法律出版社，1999年版

17. 克勞德•D•柔沃，喬登•D•沙博，《合同法》（美國法精要），法律出版社，1999年版

18. 羅伯特•W•漢密爾頓，《公司法》（美國法精要），法律出版社，1999年版

原版參考書：

1. Debra S. Lee, American Legal English, University of Michigan Press, 1999.
2. G. Gunther, Cases and Marterials on Constitutional Law, 1975.
3．Mark W. Janis, An Introction to International Law, Aspen Publishers, 2003
4．John Rawls, A Theory of Justice, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971.

5. John Makdisi, Introction to the Study of Law, Cincinnati: Anderson Publishing Co., 1990.

6. William Burnham, Introction to the Law and Legal System of the United States, 3rd Edition, West Group, 2002

❺ 法律英語翻譯（中文翻譯成英文）

The new company law of our company is the new milestone, the legislation of one-person company name is much, but the new "law of one-man company system design also regret. The most obvious defects is only specified lawmakers established the legal status of one-man company, but did not make clear the legal status of one-man company, and the emperor l degrees between them. This paper is intended to clarify the surviving theoretically the necessity of establishing one company law and its characteristics of the perfect company some Suggestions. On January 1, 2006, the new company law formally implement system of one-man company, is a formal establishment method, the debate over a long time, finally in our company legislation has been clear. This is our company LiFaShi the progress, but the new "law of one-man company system design also regret. The most obvious defects is only specified lawmakers established the legal status of one-man company, but did not make clear the legal status of one-man company, and between the two systems. It will be on the actual operation of the "law of cause trouble. This paper is intended to clarify the surviving theoretically the necessity of establishing one company and the legal characteristics, and the improvement of the law of some Suggestions.
The first part of the surviving company mainly discussed the basic theoretical analysis.
The second section describes all of one company legislation and comments.
The third part of the existence of law of one-man company to stand.

❻ 法律英語在線翻譯，在線急等啊！！ [摘要] 晚清《公司律》問世於20世紀初期，是我國歷史上第一部明確的公

The company law of the late qing dynasty made in the 20th century, china's history is the first part of corporate law, for the development of our company legislation laid the foundation of our legal system, is the modernization of the beginning. the company law of the late qing dynasty period of late qing dynasty issued to private factories to set up a company providing legal basis for the protection of the rights, promoting national instry developed rapidly and our company progress in legislation have a positive impetus to, but owing to the company law of china's multinational rulemaking

❼ 法律英語高手 翻譯 謝謝·

我去

❽ 法律英語高手請進，高分求公司法英語翻譯（三）

(C) Company on behalf of the right to special circumstances

Germany "shares the Company Law," Article 112 provides that in relation to members of the Board, the Board of Supervisors in court on behalf of the company and outside. "The Japanese Commercial Code," Article 175-4 and the "Special Law of Commercial Law" section of the provisions of Article 24-25, in the company's directors, or directors of the company when the proceedings on behalf of the company supervisors can. Chinese "Company Law" Article 54 of the directors, senior management officer in the execution of corporate ties in violation of laws and administrative regulations or the provisions of the Articles of Association, to the company damage that can be directors, senior management proceedings.

(Iv) operational implementation of negates the right to

Means that when the Board of Supervisors found that the company's operational activities illegal live damage the interests of the company, the power to pass relevant personnel to stop their behavior. "The Japanese Commercial Code," Article 275 bis, as director of corporate purposes is not within the scope of the acts, or other illegal act or acts of the statute, the company has a significant risk of harm, the Ombudsman may request the cessation of acts of directors . Germany, China has given to the board of supervisors of the terms of the statute.

(E) the right of shareholders to convene the General Assembly

When the board of directors could not be convened, or just an effect of the General Assembly to convene the shareholders, the board of supervisors may convene general meeting of shareholders. Germany "shares the Company Law," Article 111 provides that if the company required benefits, the board of supervisors shall convene general meeting of shareholders. "The Japanese Commercial Code" section 131 require that a general meeting convened by the Board decision, but the provisions of this Act or the Articles of Association, except by the Board of Supervisors convened. . Chinese "Company Law" Article 54 provides that the board of directors and supervisors do not fulfill the provisions of this law will be convened and presided over the meeting of shareholders convened and presided over ties provisional shareholders meeting;

(Vi) company the right to know

Companies the right to know the operation of the board of supervisors are the premise of performing its monitoring function. "The Japanese Commercial Code," Article 260 provides for 3 of the Board of Supervisors and the views of the right to attend the right of submission. Germany, "shares company law" provisions of the board of directors of the board of supervisors have an obligation to report regularly on the company's future operational implementation of business policy, for-profit, business and other matters progress. Chinese Company Law does not require this.

❾ 法律英語高手請進，高分求公司法英語翻譯（四）

三. Chinese defects exist board of supervisors system and its perfect
(A) the company board of supervisors system deficiencies exist
In 2005, the Chinese the "Company Law" concted a thorough amendment, introced a lot of other civil law countries the best system, the board of supervisors system also must be perfect, but through the above-mentioned civil law system of internal supervisors contrast, can be found Chinese board of supervisors system still exist some deficiencies in the following:
1. Chinese companies to the board of supervisors and even the loss of the independence of the independence of the weaker
Chinese "Company Law" provisions of the company's directors, managers and financial responsible person should not act as supervisors, this provision is undoubtedly correct. Actual situation, however, members of the board of supervisors and board members have resial superior-subordinate relationship, especially state-owned enterprises are the original company, chairman of the board is often the original enterprise party secretary, the board of supervisors is chaired by the Chairman of Commission for Discipline Inspection, secretary or trade unions, which kinds of resial effects of a superior-subordinate relationship of the Board of Supervisors can only play; Chinese Company Law in support of the majority shareholders control the election of the board of supervisors, board of supervisors by the shareholders attending the meeting by the General Assembly of shareholders held more than half of the voting rights arising from the adoption of the majority shareholders can control supervisors of elections, in order to make their own or their agents to become supervisors, board of supervisors do not have independence. Trade union representative to sit on the board of supervisors, their payroll, job decision by general manager, when faced with other supervisors oversee the object of his dismissal of the dangers, how to assume ties of supervision? At this point does not have the independence of supervisors.
2. The board of supervisors improve the quality of personnel to be
The company's operating behavior generally involve financial, auditing, and legal expertise, the board of supervisors to be able to exert effective oversight function, it must have the relevant professionals, the quality of supervisors should have the corresponding requirements. And Chinese companies in the establishment of the board of supervisors did not review the supervisors Strict qualifications, the corporate charter and few qualified supervisors to determine the consideration process.
3. The board of supervisors the authority is too small
And Germany, Japan, the board of supervisors system, the supervisory board of China's lack of a number of important powers:
⑴ supervisors does not confer the right to internal oversight. The supervision of the board of supervisors objects are all located on the board of supervisors of the people and things outside, but under the supervision of their own, this is not concive to the board of supervisors of the honesty and self-discipline and the common progress of supervisors, workers and supervisors in the Supervisory Board's position, how to exercise their functions and powers; workers and supervisors shareholders supervisors happened differences on specific issues, how to resolve and so on.
⑵ supervisors proposed the convening of the shareholders meeting, did not provide the board of directors does not convene at the time of relief measures.
⑶ not given to the operation of the board of supervisors of the company's right to know.
4. The lack of supervisors of the incentive and restraint mechanisms
Chinese "Company Law" section 148 generally provides that "supervisors should comply with laws and administrative regulations and articles of incorporation, the company has a ty of loyalty and diligence obligations", although in the old method based on the increased lot of prohibitions, it is still a lack of incentives mechanism, without in order to mobilize the enthusiasm of Supervisors; because of the board of supervisors meeting to take a collective decision-making style, this held accountable manner without the specific proceres may not be able to implement the responsibility of indivials, bound by a mechanism could be implemented. The ty of loyalty, confidentiality and other obligations if not fulfilled, if not assume liability would give rise to be removed from office, as well as the removal of specific proceres, such as how to not make any provisions.
Outside the 300 years of the company's practice management system for the functional design of the board of supervisors has accumulated substantial experience. Although the board of supervisors system should not entirely rule out the illegal operators, but its effectiveness should be affirmative. In recent years in Germany and Japan, the United States and other countries the company's internal oversight mechanisms and explore the adjustment also reflects the international trend. China only on the basis of the needs of economic development, company law legislation in response to the above inadequacies of Supervisors (will) improve the system before the socialist market economy can guarantee the smooth development.