刑法英文版

⑴ 求 刑法中關於 教唆犯的外文資料..英文的

教唆犯是指教唆他人犯罪的人。即自己並不親自參加某種犯罪，而是以自己的言行去引起他人產生犯罪意圖，通過他人去實施犯罪。教唆犯是共同犯罪人中最為復雜的一種類型，社會危害性大。教唆犯具有以下特點：
1．必須具有引起他人產生犯罪意圖的教唆行為。也就是用勸說、慫恿、利誘、收買、威脅等方法，將自己的犯罪意圖灌輸給本無犯罪意圖，或雖有犯罪意圖但不堅定的人，使他人接受自己犯罪意圖，堅定犯罪的決心，以達到犯罪的目的。如果是對已經決定犯罪的人再用言辭鼓勵，促其順利實施犯罪，該種行為屬於幫助犯罪，不屬於教唆犯。
2．必須具有教唆他人犯罪的故意，過失不能構成教唆犯。即明知自己的教唆行為會引起他人產生犯罪的意圖，進而實施犯罪，並且希望或者放任他人去犯罪。如果由於言詞不慎，無意間說的一些話，引起了他人的犯罪意圖，導致了犯罪的發生，不能認為是教唆犯。
對於教唆犯的刑事責任，根據刑法的規定，分為以下三種情況：
1．教唆他人犯罪，應當按照他在共同犯罪中所起的作用處罰。所謂教唆犯在共同犯罪中的作用，是指教唆行為在共同犯罪中所佔的地位和它的實際危害，即教唆犯教唆的方法、手段、教唆的程度，對完成共同犯罪所起的作用，及其在實施所教唆的犯罪中所起的作用。由於教唆犯在共同犯罪中所起的作用不同，其行為的危害程度也不同，在處罰上也應有所不同，對在共同犯罪中起主要作用的應按照刑法關於主犯的處罰規定處罰。
2．教唆不滿18周歲的人犯罪，應當從重處罰。這主要是因為未成年人的發育不夠成熟，辨別是非的能力較差，易受壞人教唆而陷入犯罪的歧途，所以教唆未成年人犯罪本身就是一種嚴重的犯罪行為，具有更大的社會危害性。為了保護青少年的健康成長，打擊壞人對他們的腐蝕，法律作了特別規定。
3．如果被教唆人沒有犯被教唆的罪，對於教唆犯，可以從輕或者減輕處罰。所謂「被教唆人沒有犯被教唆的罪」包括兩種情況：一是教唆犯的教唆沒有起到使被教唆人產生犯罪意圖，實施犯罪的作用，被教唆人既沒有實施教唆犯教唆的犯罪，也沒有實施其他犯罪，其教唆行為沒有造成任何實際危害結果。二是被教唆人沒有犯所教唆的罪，而犯了其他罪。不論哪一種情況，都是教唆犯罪，應當承擔刑事責任。但由於被教唆人沒有實施所教唆的罪，教唆犯的教唆行為尚未造成實際的危害結果，或者雖造成危害結果，但與其教唆行為沒有因果關系，因而對教唆犯可以從輕或者減輕處罰。
_______________________________________________________
Abetting is abetting others to commit crime. That is, he does not personally participate in some kind of crime, but in their own words and deeds to cause others to have criminal intent, by others to the crime. Instigator is the most common perpetrators of a type of complex, large harmful to society. Instigator has the following characteristics:
1. Must have caused others to proce the instigation of acts of criminal intent. That is, by persuasion, encouragement, incement, bribery, threats and so on, their criminal intent to ecate the non-criminal intent or criminal intent but not despite the firm, bringing others to accept their own criminal intent, the firm's determination to crime, To achieve the purpose of crime. If the crime of people have decided to use words to encourage and promote the smooth implementation of crime, such acts are to crime, not instigator.
2. Others must be abetting the crime intentionally, the fault does not constitute solicitation to commit. That is, knowing that their actions will cause others to abet a criminal intent, then the crime and expressed the hope that laissez-faire or others to crime. As if the words inadvertently, unintentionally said something that caused the criminal intent of others, led to the crime occurred, can not be considered instigator.
The instigator of criminal responsibility, in accordance with the provisions of the Penal Code, divided into the following three conditions:
1. Abetting others to crime, he should be in accordance with common crimes in the role played by the punishment. The so-called instigator in the role of common crime, is abetting acts of common crime in the share of its status and the actual harm, that is, instigator abetting the ways, means and abetting the extent of the completion of the common crime of the role played by, And the implementation of abetting the crime in the role. As instigator of common crime in the role played by different, the threat of their actions are also different, in the punishment should also be different, in common crime play a major role should be in accordance with the Criminal Code on the principal provisions of the penalty punishment.
2. Abetting under the age of 18 crimes, should be harshly punished. This is mainly because not enough of the minor's maturity, the ability to distinguish right from wrong poor, vulnerable to bad guys and abetting a crime astray, abetting a minor crime itself is a serious crime, greater harm to society Sexual. In order to protect the healthy growth of young people against bad people to their corrosion, the law made special provisions.
3. If people are not abetting the crimes committed by abetting, instigator, or can be relatively light punishment was reced. The so-called "abetting people who are not abetting the crime," including the two situations: First, not instigator of abetting a person to be abetting a criminal intent, the role of the crime, people do not have been abetting the instigator of the crime abetting Nor the implementation of other crimes, abetting acts did not cause any actual harm results. The second is being instigated by people not guilty of abetting the crime and committed other crimes. Regardless of what kind of situation, are abetting crime, should bear criminal responsibility. However, e to people not being instigated by the implementation of abetting the crime, instigator of abetting acts have not yet caused actual harm results, or cause damage although the results, but its no causal relationship abetting acts, thus mitigating the instigator or can rece the punishment.

⑵ 刑法上的英文翻譯 高手進來（有點多麻煩了）

Omission accomplice is the omission and common crime competing crime patterns, in one of the few domestic system. An omission in not as an accomplice of the theory involved and very broad in scope, given the complexity of multiple, this article focuses on the omission of the theory as well as accomplices in reality the actual type is found. Currently without omission of the study is based on the omission of common crime overall in the discussions, there is no system for their research, expositions. Although there are some papers on common crime theory was discussed, but rarely in conjunction with the specific situation of our country, and ignoring the omission of complicity in the law, it is difficult to be impure common crime theory in its judicial role, particularly through more dependent on outside the theoretical discussion, is not concive to the theory of reference. This article is divided into four chapters, the first chapter is impure introction to the main exposition of complicity, impure accomplice need clear basic concepts such as not to act, omission, accomplice, not as an accomplice, omission of complicity; chapter II is impure accomplices, the main exposition of impure accomplices in the elements of the relevant theories including the subjective element of objective elements; chapter III is the omission of an accomplice, typed, in discussing the omission of elements of the theory of accomplices, the focus of China's judicial practice in many cases, typed essay on different types of omission of accomplices. Chapter four is impure accomplice liability, analysis of impure accomplice typed up focus by omission constitute existence of complicity and a penalty. Title: omission as an accomplice;;; omission introction to complicity; omission concept; no concept as an accomplice; omission concept of complicity; omission accomplices; omission the subjective aspect of complicity; omission of complicity; omission accomplice typed analysis; relatives or guardianship, not being responsible; closed or management space not as responsibility; responsibility of neutral Act; Act of omission responsibility; omission of joint criminal liability; omission accomplices responsibility; omission is committing; omission accessory; omission instigator

⑶ 請介紹幾篇有關刑法的外文參考文獻

【參考文獻】
[1)李海東．刑法原理入門（犯罪論基礎）[M]．北京：法律出版社，1998．
[2]〔美〕邁克爾·D·貝勒斯．法律的原則——一個規范的分析[M]．張文顯等譯．北京：中國大網路全書出版社，1996．
[3]〔日〕瀧川幸辰．犯罪論序說[A]．王泰譯．高銘暄，趙秉志．刑法論叢：第3卷[M]．北京：法律出版社，1999．
[4]張明楷．刑法分則的解釋原理[M]．北京：中國人民大學出版社，2004．
[5]〔日〕長岡龍一．刑法の解釋と罪刑法定主義の原則（一）[J]．東北學院大學論集·法律學第10號．
[6]〔日〕川端博，山中敬一，日高義博．鼎談？罪刑法定主義の問題狀況[A]．現代刑事法[M]．2001，(11)．
[7]〔日〕平野龍一．刑法總論Ⅰ[M]．有斐閣，1972．
[8]高銘暄，馬克昌．刑法學[M]．北京：北京大學出版社，高等教育出版社，2000．
[9]〔日〕內藤謙．刑法講義總論（上）[M]．有斐閣，1983．
[10]陳忠林．從外在形式到內在價值的追求——罪刑法定原則蘊含的價值沖突與我國應有的立法選擇[J]．現代法學，1997，(1)．
[11]〔日〕牧野英一．日本刑法（第64版）[M]．有斐閣，1939．
[12]趙秉志，吳振興．刑法學通論[M]．北京：高等教育出版社，1993．
[13]〔日〕曾根威嚴．刑法總論（第3版）[M]．弘文堂，2000．
[14]〔日〕ホセョンパルト．罪刑法定主義——法哲學と實定法學の課題として[A]．法哲學年報（法哲學と實定法學）[C]．有斐閣，1976．
[15]〔日〕山口厚．刑法總論[M]．有斐閣，2001．
[16]儲槐植．美國刑法（第2版）[M]．北京：北京大學出版社，1996．
[17]〔日〕瀧川春雄．自由主義刑法の山脈と世界觀[A]．平場安治．瀧川先生還歷紀念（現代刑法學の課題）（上）[C]．有斐閣，1955．

⑷ 求 20000字元左右的英文刑法學文獻

http://books.google.com.sg/books?id=bMbmrsu0wDgC&pg=PA204&lpg=PA204&dq=traffic+accident+law&source=web&ots=-RTuRt4Dkp&sig=7DgW8ctPjOMhH-_l6ZW3A3gZVS4&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=6&ct=result

http://www.ustrafficaccidentlawyers.com/

http://www.expertlaw.com/library/personal_injury/automobile.html

⑸ 為什麼選擇刑法專業的英文介紹

介紹：

Last summer vacation, my mother and I went to see my uncle in Singapore.

Singapore is an island country and a city country in Southeast Asia.

Singapore is also known as "garden city" because of its remarkable effect on city cleaning.

When we arrived in Singapore, my uncle led us on the street.

We had a good time. I found a strange phenomenon.

Singaporeans abide by the rules in public, on the road and in life. No one violates the rules?

What's the matter?

With all kinds of questions, I asked my uncle, "uncle, uncle, why do Singaporeans abide by the rules?"

My uncle said, "ha ha, it seems that you didn't know Singapore before you came here.

There is a criminal law in Singapore called flogging. "

As soon as I heard the word whip, my hair was cold and my heart was raw. "

You don't have to be afraid, only the men's whipping, the women's not."

Hearing this, my heart fell. "The whipping people are all trained to whip three lashes at your butt.

If you do more, there are only three lashes on your butt, like a flower, because Singapore is a flower city.

So the whiplash is like a flower.

Sometimes chewing gum can be whipped. " I immediately felt that, why are we all human beings?

We Shenzhen people are very disobedient to the system and always violate the system.

But the Chinese are very obedient and do not violate the system.

I think the Chinese have strict criminal law.

They dare not violate the system and are afraid of being punished by law.

And we don't have strict criminal law and violate the system in disorder.

翻譯：

去年暑假，我和媽媽去新加坡看大舅。

新加坡是東南亞的一個島國，也是一個城市國家。新加坡在城市保潔方面效果顯著，故亦有「花園城市」之美稱。

到了新加坡，大舅領我們在街上走，我們玩的很快樂，我發現了一個很奇怪的現象，新加坡的人無論是在公共場合、道路和生活上都很遵守制度，沒有一個人違反制度？

這是怎麼一回事？我帶著種種疑問，去問大舅：「大舅，大舅，為什麼新加坡的人都很遵守制度呀？」

大舅說：「呵呵，看來你來之前還沒有了解新加坡呀。新加坡有一種刑法，叫做鞭刑。」我一聽到鞭字，我就毛骨悚然，心裡發毛。「你不用害怕，只有男的抽鞭刑，女的不抽。」聽到這句話，我的心才落下。

「抽鞭的人都是經過專業培訓，對著你屁股抽三鞭，如果抽多了，你的屁股上還是只有三道鞭痕，像一朵花，因為新加坡是一個花的城市。所以抽出來的鞭痕像一朵花。有時候吃口香糖都可能被抽鞭刑。」

我頓時覺得，為什麼都是人，我們深圳人就很不遵守制度，總是違反制度。而華人卻很遵守制度，不違反制度，我覺得吧華人有嚴格的刑法，他們不敢違反制度，怕受法律制裁。而我們就沒有嚴格的刑法，亂違反制度。

我希望，我們也有嚴格的刑法，讓那些亂違法制度的人接受制裁。

⑹ 中華人民共和國刑法的英文

Criminal Law of the PRC, imprisonment, life imprisonment, confiscation of property, looting caused many injuries, deaths

⑺ 請問我們國家的各種刑法罪名用英文都怎麼說啊

洗錢罪
money laundry

⑻ 刑法拿英語怎麼說

National People's Congress member
"About Punishment Destruction Finance Order Crime Decision"
Stipulation
Gathers capital
Revision
Situation,
Additionally builds
Charge,
A minute piece (probably is fascicle and so on, several volume,several piece....)
Concept characteristic,
Constitution important document,
Judicial demarcation line,
Crime prevention
Elaboration,
Enhances rightly.. Understanding,
Thus
Effectively
Attack
Prevention

⑼ 為什麼國外關於民法的英文原版書較少，刑法和憲法都有。。

哈哈！你應該注抄意到了，英語國家大多是英美法系，英美法系的法律部門劃分中沒有民法這個部門，所以關於民法的英文原版書就比較少。而刑法、憲法是各國基本都有的法律部門，所以這類書的數量就很大。
從民法發展來看，現在的德語和日本是主流，如果要學習民法，最好還是學習日本或者德國的。當然，法國、義大利、俄羅斯等國的民法也值得借鑒。如果是為了研究中國民法，最好還是從中國實際出發。

⑽ Help! 求助以下美國法律中英文對照版，必須是全文。

你可以進美國大學的網上圖書館里找，都會有的：
耶魯大學圖書館：www.library.yale.e
芝加內哥大學圖容書館：http://www.lib.uchicago.e