当前位置:首页 » 法律知识 » 承担责任法律英语

承担责任法律英语

发布时间: 2022-04-29 04:30:17

『壹』 为什么法律术语“责任”和“债务”对应同一个英文单词liability

Liability专指因法律后果形成的债务,也就是民事法律责任(相对于个人借贷形成的债务debt),因为货币赔偿是最常见的一种民事赔偿方式,所以从法律角度讲这个债务等同于责任.

『贰』 一句法律英语,求准确翻译。学位论文用,求大神们帮助。

A third was that ISPs "reap rewards for infringing activity"in the form of added subscribers and increased usages,and they should therefore "bear the responsibilities"associated with that activity.
可以学位论文用的准确翻译:
第三种情况就是,互联网服务供应商,通过已经增加的用户数量和更多的使用量的形式,“因侵权活动而获得了奖赏”,因此他们应该“承担”与那些活动相关的“责任”。

『叁』 由此引发的一切经济、法律责任由我单位自行承担英文怎么说

NHK : The organization, XXXX, will be liable for any economic and legal liability incurred herefrom (= 这单位, XXXX, 将会承担因此而发生的任何经济和法律负任)~...或是写成 The organization, XXXX, will be liable for any economic and legal consequence incurred herefrom (= 这单位, XXXX, 将会承担因此而发生的任何经济和法律后果)...XXXX 是你单位的名称...为了表示承诺...应该把你单位的正式名称...加进句子里呗~...句末的 herefrom...是英式法律用语...解作 由此 / 因此...而 liability 在商业界...1般是解作 负债...但是...在法律英语中...是解作"法定的责任"~..."一切"(= all)的意思...有时候...会比较难定义...难掌握...而且...有些法律责任...不是单位可以负担起的...那么...在法律英语中...通常是改用 any (= 任何)...最后..."我单位"的意义...比较虚无...是法人组织 ??...是公共组织 ??...或是私人团体 ??...偶只能...暂时以英文的 the organization (= 这组织 / 这单位)去定义...如果是"公司"的话...可以改写成 the company...或是 the corporation...请不要写成 "our" organization (= "我们"组织 / "我们"单位)...公司和单位...是独立的法人团体...不应该跟"我"...或"我们"...混在1起...不然...在法理上...会有问题的...如果你这1句...是纯粹用于销售产品...给予客户售后承诺的话...即是...不需要很严格的法律要求...那么...带1点"直译"的方式...写成 Our organization will be liable for any economic and legal liability incurred herefrom (= 我单位将会承担因此而发生的任何经济和法律负任)...也是可以接受滴~...要采用"经济和法律责任"...还是"经济和法律后果"...你可以自己决定哟~...1般来说..."责任 / Liability"是比较直接的损失和伤害...而"后果 / Consequence"所覆盖...以及影响的范围...会比较广...再者...后果是包括了..."连锁反应式"的责任呗~....哈哈哈嘻........

『肆』 法律英语翻译网

a person who患有may be able to use法律金错Law to receive从某人谁是legally负责赔偿金”,承担责任”,for those损伤..torts封面intentional Acts and事故例如,爱丽丝throws球和不小心打布伦达的眼睛。布伦达May苏爱丽丝for损失事故(例如,occasioned by the costs of medical treatment,失去的收入在时间关闭工作,面包和痛苦,等。)whether or not布伦达赢得她如果她能证明是取决于我们tortious爱丽丝engaged in行为one of the手topics of the物质是Determining the Law of错了“护理标准”句that means区别之间的法律行为是当金is not tortious。put another way,The Big Issue is whether a person患有the loss from his own损伤,或whether it gets transferred to别人如果它是年的事故,布伦达必须证明疏忽。要做到这一点,我要展示她的损伤是合理的Foreseeable,,爱丽丝欠布伦达ty of care not to hit her with the球,and that爱丽丝failed to meet the standard of care requiredin much of the Western World,试金石of错责任是玩忽职守。if the injured party不能证明that the person to have caused the损伤认为做以及疏忽,at the very least,will not compensate他们错法。错误的法律也承认intentional错误和严格责任,which apply to engage in一定defendants谁的行动

『伍』 在法律英语里,liable ,accountable用法有什么区别吗responsible>liable ,accountable

accountable主要指负有说明解释的责任,liable则是赔偿补救的责任。

下面这句话就是说这家公司需要对食物中的玻璃片这件事情作出解释,如果换成liable则是需要承担赔偿补救的责任。

『陆』 我公司愿为此承担相应的法律责任 英文怎么说

My company is willing to undertake the relative legal obligations and liabilities of the document loss

『柒』 翻译一句,关于赔偿的法律英语

此外,来这种情况下,自卖方应对买方承担违约责任:卖方应向买方支付相当于合同价格 10 %的违约金;
Furthermore,in this case, the Seller shall shoulder its responsibility for breaking the Contract as following: the Seller should pay the Buyer 10 % of the total value of the Contract as breach penalty.

『捌』 法律英语翻译。急!

tort law of strict liability from the United Kingdom, has now become the mainland legal scholars often use the concept. European countries have been integrated into the principles of tort law system of Liability. In recent years, the scope of strict liability for the widening trend. Strict liability is based on the absolute obligation of security breach, although when it is done to the most careful of people's attention, but any damage caused by their actions and take responsibility. Defense against strict liability is very limited, reasonable care not among them. Strict liability for abnormally dangerous most frequent activity or proct liability cases.
The essential characteristics of strict liability
(A) the fault of the non-strict liability
Strict liability is undoubtedly the responsibility of following the fault which occurred after a new milestone. It is the advent of the fault is to determine the factors responsible is no longer the ultimate basis for liability, which is concive to protecting the innocent victims and vulnerable groups.
(B) the risk of strict liability
Looking at national tort law, strict liability and risk are inevitably linked. German civil law countries, said strict liability for hazardous ty. Some scholars would risk liability and strict liability common law equivalent. Similarly in France the use of a dangerous activity as the basis of strict liability. [20] but in fact Anglo-American tort law, strict liability apply to animals in addition to causing the infringement, workers compensation, proct liability, the most unusual is for harm caused by hazardous activities.
(C) Strict Liability of
Offenders in their fault liability for damage arising in, the reason is because the liability of the perpetrator can be a moral disapproval of. However, the perpetrator of strict liability without fault, will still be liable, the attribution of the basis for intriguing. The western half of the 20th century's most influential jurists of Pond from the maintenance of social security obligations generally off, demonstrates the rationality of strict liability. He believes that since the late 19th century, the legal interests of the community rather than focus on the protection of personal interests.
(D) strict liability causality
Responsibility for the fault is the fault element of the final decision is to determine whether the establishment of the key fault liability. In the composition of the elements of strict liability, regardless of whether the offender's fault. Therefore, the causal relationship has more significance, it is the ultimate constituent elements of strict liability element. Strict liability in the causation and damage are only two elements, namely, proof of causation by the plaintiff as long as the damage to these two factors and can get relief.
(E) of strict liability Juzheng
Strict liability is based on the absolute security breach of its obligations, regardless of whether the defendant to do the ty of care to the most cautious, as long as it should be responsible for the damage occurred, if the defendant can not be reasonable to defense (and defense is very limited), you can not remove responsibility, that is part of the plaintiff's burden of proof shifted to the defendant, the plaintiff only to prove causation and damage had been sufficient.
(F) defense of strict liability in the Restrictive
1, the third behavior, animal behavior and the forces of nature cause damage can not be the defenses.
2, the victim can not be the fault of defense.
3, the victims of people, things and animals, abnormal sensitivity can be used as defense.
4, the performance of public ties as defense.
Comment on the strict liability
(A) availability: American tort law is rooted in the philosophy of pragmatism in the soil, advocating people-centered, knowledge and human experience claims can not be separated, emphasizing the unity of theory and practice. On this basis, the case law system is the empirical wisdom of judges and logical reasoning with the proct. The strict liability from the case law through evolution, widening the scope of its application, this fact itself proves the rule dynamic and practical.
(B) Transcendence: whether scholars have the responsibility of strict liability is equivalent to what different opinions, but no doubt that it goes beyond the French law "presumption of fault liability" and the German law, "dangerous ty," and broke through to abstract known for speculative and logically coherent system of civil law tort theory of barriers to a unified system to a al responsibility principle or the principle of diversity attributable to system development, and thus the world had a profound influence legislation.
(C) justice: perpetrators and victims of strict liability emphasized to achieve a balance of interests, reflecting the protection of the weak instead of the new concept of equal protection, and to achieve substantial justice. This is in the field of proct liability and workers compensation in particular stands out.
要悬赏分呀!

『玖』 法律责任的英文

legal responsibility
法律责任

政府即使没有法律责任,在道义上也有责任来赔偿。内
The Government had a moral, if not a legal ty to pay compensation.

当局负有逮捕容所有疑犯的法律责任。
The authorities will be legally bound to arrest any suspects.

结合了公司的法律责任的保障和自由通过税收结构的伙伴关系。
Combines a corporation's liability protection and pass-through tax structure of a partnership.

『拾』 合同总有关法律责任的英文翻译

Party A hereby warrants that all its entrusted matters are in compliance with the laws and regulations in China. Party B hereby warrants that all its entrusted matters are in compliance with the laws and regulations in Japan. Both Party A and Party B shall be legally responsible for Party C's agent performance as provided in this Agreement.

大致复如此,制你干活话自己润色润色吧

热点内容
商品房交接书法律效力 发布:2025-02-09 01:18:41 浏览:155
张庭法学 发布:2025-02-09 01:08:00 浏览:829
哺乳一小时劳动法 发布:2025-02-09 00:20:12 浏览:793
河南一诺司法 发布:2025-02-09 00:18:29 浏览:517
北京市法律援助中心电话地址 发布:2025-02-08 23:51:49 浏览:696
网络安全立法过程 发布:2025-02-08 23:40:38 浏览:552
诈骗罪立法目的 发布:2025-02-08 23:39:25 浏览:820
司法三效果 发布:2025-02-08 23:33:26 浏览:534
刑事诉讼法的公民代理 发布:2025-02-08 23:28:23 浏览:731
与道德有关的诗 发布:2025-02-08 23:08:55 浏览:973