法官职责英语
A. 法官职责
法官的职责：
（一）依法参加合议庭审判或者独任审判案件；
（二）法律规定的其他职责。内
审判案件是指法官容依照法律的规定，通过对案件的审理，以查明案件事实，并适用法律以作出判决的活动。
法官除了依法参加合议庭审判案件或者独任审判案件以外，还必须依法审查起诉以决定是否立案；依法裁定予以减刑、假释；依法裁定采取诉前保全或者先予执行措施；依法裁定采取诉讼保全措施；依法对妨害诉讼者决定给予强制措施；依法解决下级法院之间管辖权争议；依法指导下级法院工作；依法向有关单位提出司法建议等；同时必须办理下列事项：（一）处理不需要开庭审理的民事纠纷和轻微的刑事案件；（二）指导人民调解委员会的工作。
这个真的可以网络一下，呵呵~~~~
B. 有没有人能简单介绍一下美国的法官制度啊（要英文版的)
An administrative law judge (ALJ) in the United States is an official who presides at an administrative trial-type hearing to resolve a dispute between a government agency and someone affected by a decision of that agency. The ALJ is the initial trier of fact and decision maker. ALJ's can administer oaths, take testimony, rule on questions of evidence, and make factual and legal determinations.[1] The proceeding involved with the ALJ may be similar to a summary judgment.
Procere for reviewing an ALJ's decision varies depending upon the agency. Agencies generally have an internal appellate body, with some agencies having a Cabinet secretary deciding the final internal appeals. Moreover, after the internal agency appeals have been exhausted, a party may have the right to file an appeal in the courts. Relevant statutes usually require a party to exhaust all administrative appeals before they are allowed to sue an agency in court.
Federal ALJ's are appointed under the Administrative Procere Act (APA). Their appointments are non-political and based on scores achieved in a comprehensive testing procere. Federal ALJs are the only merit-based judicial corps in the United States.
The APA is designed to guarantee the independence of ALJs. They have absolute immunity from liability for their judicial acts and are triers of fact "insulated from political influence." Federal administrative law judges are not responsible to, or subject to the supervision or direction of employees or agents of the federal agency engaged in the performance of investigative or prosecution functions for the agency. Agency officials may not interfere with their decision making and administrative law judges may be discharged only for good cause established and determined after a hearing on the record. [2]
Only, ALJ's receive these protections. Some agencies conct hearings before indivials referred to as "hearing officers" or "trial examiners." These indivials may perform functions similar to those of ALJ's, but they are not protected by the APA.
In American administrative law, ALJs are Article I judges, and are not Article III judges under the U.S. Constitution. Unlike Article III judges, Article I judges are not confirmed by the Senate. However, the United States Supreme Court has recognized that the role of a federal administrative law judge is "functionally comparable" to that of an Article III judge. An ALJs powers are often, if not generally, comparable to those of a trial judge: He may issue subpoenas, rule on proffers of evidence, regulate the course of the hearing, and make or recommend decisions. The process of agency adjudication is currently structured so as to assure that the hearing examiner exercises his independent judgment on the evidence before him, free from pressures by the parties or other officials within the agency." [3]
Most U.S. states have a statute modeled after the APA or somewhat similar to it. In some states, like New Jersey, the state law is also known as the Administrative Procere Act.
Unlike Federal ALJs, whose powers are guaranteed by the APA federal statute, state ALJs have widely varying power and prestige. In some state law contexts, ALJs have almost no power; their decisions are accorded practically no deference and become, in effect, recommendations. In some agencies, ALJs dress like lawyers in business suits, share offices, and hold hearings in ordinary conference rooms. In other agencies (particularly the Division of Workers' Compensation of the California Department of Instrial Relations), ALJs wear robes like Article III judges, insist on being called "Honorable" and "Your Honor," work in private chambers, hold hearings in special "hearing rooms" that look like little courtrooms, and have court clerks who swear in witnesses.
There are three nationwide professional organizations for ALJs: the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (note that there is no "the" in the NAALJ's name), the Federal Administrative Law Judges Conference, and the Association of Administrative Law Judges.
C. 英语单词：法官；审判员。
judge Inquisitor
D. 超急！高分！模拟法庭程序，法官作用和用语，英语高手来……
建议去看一下 boston legal
每一集里面都有法庭，法官。这样你可以更直观的了解庭审程序和法官作用
E. 法官用英语怎么说
法官——bands,deemster,gownsman,judge（美，英）,judiciary,justicer,law-officer 较常用，美英都可。其他都太正式，可能法律公文中会用吧
F. 法官的具体职责！
根据《中华人民共和国法官法》
第五条法官的职责：
（一）依法参加合议庭审判或者独任审判案件；
（二）法律规定的其他职责。
第七条法官应当履行下列义务：
（一）严格遵守宪法和法律；
（二）审判案件必须以事实为根据，以法律为准绳，秉公办案，不得徇私枉法；
（三）依法保障诉讼参与人的诉讼权利；
（四）维护国家利益、公共利益，维护自然人、法人和其他组织的合法权益；
（五）清正廉明，忠于职守，遵守纪律，恪守职业道德；
（六）保守国家秘密和审判工作秘密；
（七）接受法律监督和人民群众监督。
(6)法官职责英语扩展阅读
法官的条件
第九条担任法官必须具备下列条件：
（一）具有中华人民共和国国籍；
（二）年满二十三岁；
（三）拥护中华人民共和国宪法；
（四）有良好的政治、业务素质和良好的品行；
（五）身体健康；
（六）高等院校法律专业本科毕业或者高等院校非法律专业本科毕业具有法律专业知识，从事法律工作满二年，其中担任高级人民法院、最高人民法院法官，应当从事法律工作满三年；获得法律专业硕士学位、博士学位或者非法律专业硕士学位、博士学位具有法律专业知识，从事法律工作满一年，其中担任高级人民法院、最高人民法院法官，应当从事法律工作满二年。
G. 法官的职责和义务
法律分析：法官的职责是：1、依法参加合议庭审判或者独任审判案件；2、法律规定的其他职责。法官的义务是：1、严格遵守宪法和法律；2、审判案件必须以事实为根据，以法律为准绳，秉公办案；3、依法保障诉讼参与人的诉讼权利；4、维护国家利益、公共利益；5、保守国家秘密和审判工作秘密；6、接受法律监督和人民群众监督。法官的任职要求是：1、具有中华人民共和国国籍；2、年满23岁；3、拥护中华人民共和国宪法；4、有良好的政治、业务素质和良好的品行；5、身体健康；6、具有法学专业知识，从事法律工作满二年。
法律依据：《中华人民共和国法官法》
第五条 法官的职责：
（一）依法参加合议庭审判或者独任审判案件；
（二）法律规定的其他职责。
第七条 法官应当履行下列义务：
（一）严格遵守宪法和法律；
（二）审判案件必须以事实为根据，以法律为准绳，秉公办案，不得徇私枉法；
（三）依法保障诉讼参与人的诉讼权利；
（四）维护国家利益、公共利益，维护自然人、法人和其他组织的合法权益；
（五）清正廉明，忠于职守，遵守纪律，恪守职业道德；
（六）保守国家秘密和审判工作秘密；
（七）接受法律监督和人民群众监督。
H. 法官的英语翻译 法官用英语怎么说
法官
[法] judge更多释义>>
[网络短语]
法官专Judge;judge;chancellor
治安属法官justice of the peace;magistrate;police magistrate
军法官the judge advocate;judge advocate;Staff Judge Advocate
I. 法官的职责
法官的职责是：1、依法参加合议庭审判或者独任审判案件；2、法律规定的其他职责。法官是在司法机构中审判人员的通称，司法权的执行者，在中国大陆法官是依法行使审判权的审判人员，包括最高人民法院、地方各级人民法院和军事法院等专门人民法院的院长、副院长、审判委员会委员、庭长、副庭长、审判员和助理审判员。
【法律分析】
在庭审中，法官的基本职责首先是查清案件事实，司法上称之为事实审，其基本原则是“以事实为依据”。这一职责要求法官必须当庭充分听取双方当事人的发言，根据庭外的调查取证和庭审双方当事人的陈述，查清与案件有关的每一个事实和情节，尽可能地恢复案件事实，诉讼活动中的直接言词原则即体现在此。审判活动即使审和判的活动，审理是裁判的前提，审判中查清案件事实是审判活动的一个关键环节，因此查清案件事实也就是法官的首要职责。其次，法官的基本职责是正确适用法律。司法上称之为法律审，其基本原则是“以法律为准绳”。在案件事实查清楚的基础上，运用自己的法律专业知识，判断案件应该适用的法律。在这个过程中法官应该是独立的，他作为裁判的标准只能是案件事实，而不能受任何其他因素的干扰。也就是说，法官在裁判的过程中每个环节都要受到法律的支配，严格依法判决。一个判决是否合法、公正，很大程度上取决于司法审判人员是否严格执行法律程序，是否针对特定的客观的事实而正确地援引并解释法律。最后，法官必须依靠案件事实和相应的法律规范作出合理判决。选定要适用的法律之后，其适用程度必须恰当。在刑法中称为量刑。定罪是前提，在一种罪名下选择适当的量刑幅度一般需要依靠法官行使自由裁量权，这个环节要求法官不偏不倚地作出合理的判决。
【法律依据】
《中华人民共和国法官法》
第一条 为了全面推进高素质法官队伍建设，加强对法官的管理和监督，维护法官合法权益，保障人民法院依法独立行使审判权，保障法官依法履行职责，保障司法公正，根据宪法，制定本法。
第二条 法官是依法行使国家审判权的审判人员，包括最高人民法院、地方各级人民法院和军事法院等专门人民法院的院长、副院长、审判委员会委员、庭长、副庭长和审判员。