法学英语论文

㈠ 法学论文英文摘要翻译

Forcing employees to work is a serious infringement of personal rights and freedoms of workers， is the ancient barbaric of re-appearance of slavery。It is out of tune with the modern civilized society. In order to combat such acts, almost all countries in the world provise it to a crime , hoping that this harshest measure of peaceful times will work。For instince，in the case of "Shanxi Black Brick Kiln Case" ，which is judicial practice as a focus on China's Criminal Law, "the crime of forced employees to work" had a really natural analysis。And it ought to be constructed that in China's Criminal Law the crime of “forced employees to work" has a criminal subject, an objective aspect, behavior, objects, providing a narrow, sentencing uniformity and criminal fines。Many other vague and unreasonable discomfort of the Department result in judicial practice of the law which is difficult to be reasonable and applicable。It is difficult to combat and prevent the legislative intent of the act。That’s why the crime of forcing employees to work exerts its utmost to improve the legislation.

㈡ 法律方面的英语论文

The theory of criminal law of shallow understanding errors
1. irrtumslehre
Legal irrtumslehre, namely, refers to the illegality mistake for own behavior in law, whether what crime constitutes a crime shall be punished by, or what is wrong, is to oneself the legal nature of the action of meaning or misunderstandings. Legal irrtumslehre usually includes three conditions: (1) the actor's behavior in law does not constitute a crime, the offender and constitutes a crime for which imaginary guilty, (2) the behavior in law constitutes a crime and does not constitute a crime, the offender mistaken assumptions that innocent, (3) for his act constitutes a crime shall be convicted and punishment in light of the existing errors, misunderstanding or punishment. Due to the legal irrtumslehre, only to the behavior of the offender is not correct understanding of the legal assessment, and for their actions in fact correct understanding of the situation is still there, so its act constitutes a crime shall be investigated for criminal responsibility is and how it is not usually occurs.
（1）Imaginary innocent treatment principle
The principles for imaginary innocence, whether it involves a deliberately elements. Foreign criminal law theory basically has the following kinds:
1）Should know that don't speak, just for criminal facts have understanding. Canada criminal code article 19 regulation: "the ignorance of the law excuses and crime can be ShuZui reason." Motto: "Roman law and legal disclaimer" somehow also expressed a principle, namely: "in the crime as subjective FanYi established condition, not request to recognize his behavior of richtswitrig".
2）Should know the reason, according to two: moral responsibility theory, personality responsibility theory. Moral responsibility theory emphasizes on the rationality of free will blame illegal conct, is considered to be objective stance.
3）That said, the possible illegality of responsibility for deliberately, at least to the possibility of understanding illegality. While in China mainland, the introction of the concept of crime has another concept -- social consciousness that harm to discuss richtswitrig already meaningless. Because the deliberate crime according to law condemn the illegality of the offender is not known, the law itself is not damaged, the law of the social consciousness is harm. Social harm consciousness is the essential contents of the crime, illegal consciousness is the legal form of social consciousness. Therefore, our country law more emphasis is on the rationality of essence, which is harmful to the society values.
Just because of its social harmfulness, with a social moral evaluation colour, easier for people to grasp and observe. Therefore, the author thinks that, in general, the person need to recognize his behavior may be the result of inevitable or harmful to the society, and has already know. With intentionally But in fact, the forbidden by law and mass that is harmful to the society in our country nowadays the behavior under the constitution should be consistent, in other words, know the social harmfulness also know the possibility of illegal, but know the possibility of illegal is inevitable should also realize social harmfulness, both are unified. Therefore, it is generally thought that the law is no excuse, the reason of law does not exclude the misunderstanding in principle, but can be culpable for deliberately discretion.
（2） Misunderstandings treatment principle. Punishment
We might as well so the essence of blame for his e: the crime in the subjective should blame or blame, for the intent or negligence performance. If the offender because of misunderstanding that legal person feels very innocent, lack of this should blame or condemning sexual, from the fundamental measure, blame is absolutely not consider disclaimer. Especially in the modern society, the legal category SAN marino, legal entry in different fields and different levels of books, recognized, comprehend legal apparently endless and same, so the person of law and misunderstandings, not inexcusable. Now, both in theory and practice, the method not cling to forgive "seems to have in shake. Therefore, to a certain extent, can also think admits exceptions excusable is legal misunderstanding of criminal law is an important symbol of humanity. In addition, it was not in the act of which is prohibited by the laws and regulations, especially after a circumstance, should have knowledge of richtswitrig actor, constitute the understanding of deliberate point of view, with the attitude of this understanding, of course, that is not the illegality or by the simple statement actor. The author thinks that the only when the legal establishment of may, FangKeZu but intentionally.
2. The fact mistake
That mistake, is to determine its subjective behavior nature and the criminal responsibility of the relevant facts wrong understanding. From the wrong reasons and phenomenon of angles, generally known that there are several mistakes:
（1） Object irrtumslehre
The object is known for errors, whether there is objectively error object. It includes actor in the implementation of the existing criminal behavior of the hazards for the object and actually does not exist, or for criminal object and actually does not exist, or infringe a criminal object and actually invaded another crime object. The object of objects is usually known errors caused by mistake, but the object of different social relationship reflects different. Evil doer of objects and actual expected in fact not only harm object does not agree, and in the nature of law is not consistent. Therefore, the object irrtumslehre may affect the form of sin, crime accomplishment, and may even attempted to influence the crime. For example, in view of the circumstances, not a thought before the enemy, and a party came to stick, afterwards just know the ox was wounded. A thought of damage is "people", and the actual wounded is "cow", do not belong to the same laws of the object. Similar situation and will generally be mistaken for drug trafficking items, Actor will stolen items in the theft of guns in stealing together. This object from the subjective errors, see, is a kind of mistake, From the objective, because the mistake crime to no avail, where the criminal attempted belongs.
1）Object mistake
Objects can be generalized mistake, including object mistake to belong to the object know mistake is inevitable object irrtumslehre. These include, is known to be wrong object of legal property of the same object mistake and legal properties of different objects, namely the object irrtumslehre irrtumslehre. In order to distinguish with the object mistake here, the cognition to the same object only mean error between the different objects, namely the misunderstanding of the evil doer expected objects and actual harm to the object, but not in fact in the legal nature of the same situation. This object mistake again say things on purpose mistake not criminal responsibility. As a reserve, killing b shall be killed as b and c, do not affect a rap. This is the need to consider that a kill b behavior "mistake" cause others (c), belong to an intentional crime (b) "death", for the excess result, according to the results, which determine the ordinary mail of death was deliberately recognized for deliberately, to the death of the fault is propylene, identified as negligence, according to the intention or negligence of the general mark recognized FanYi or state of mind, not applicable rules of the mistake.
2） Behavior irrtumslehre
Behavior mainly includes two kind of mistake: first, the behavior nature irrtumslehre. That actor has to its social harm nature, such as understanding not imaginary defense. Behavior nature mistake might affect the form of sin, and may also affect crime. Second, the behavior tools (methods) irrtumslehre. That person to use when the conct of tool (methods), which affects not correct understanding of harm results, behavior tools (methods) mistake can affect crime or attempted was founded, also can affect crime or belongs to the incident, a typical for murder on hazardous substances, because the drug failure and failed to kill people, can think method or tools for error doer of consciousness beyond reason not to succeed. And as actor see armour, second coming together, hence shot to play, but can't hit by the party and. Look, this is from the phenomenon of an object, or the final results for the mistake, but this error is based on the fact that the wrong doer identify offender is carefully identify to begin, can think recognize is accurate, errors in ChaWu itself. The solution to this situation, "said", its legal with qualitative and recognize wrong object is consistent, namely directly recognized as an intentional homicide accomplishment. The death of a person is directly intentionally to b, death is the indirect intentional, just for a to b is attempted, accomplished. Additionally, if in daily life because misidentification object and damage of consequences, the crime itself is not just any criminal negligence because of problems.
3)Causality irrtumslehre
Causality mistake, is on his behavior and harmful results of actual connection between errors. Generally include: first, not some harm result, as has happened actor. This generally constitute a crime. Second, has certain harm result, but not for actor or for his behavior is caused, and does not affect crime accomplishment. Third, really happened, the offender is aware of its behavior, but with the actual development between the harm to the process or a mistake, general to punish crime accomplishment. In theory, the offender is not only a crime, but continuous movement, this several continuous action is not a few crime, but a crime. In this sense, doesn't exist on the results of the sack.
3.Legal irrtumslehre and facts mistake and proceres
Domestic scholars in fact know mistakes and errors between the issue legal representative views mainly include:
（1）For own behavior whether in law constitutes a crime, criminal or what kind of criminal punishment shall be under the incorrect understanding is legal irrtumslehre for his behavior on the implementation of the incorrect understanding is the fact that mistake,
（2）The objectivity of crime is a false understanding of crime, that mistake of objective facts have clear understanding, only to act in the evaluation of existing laws on the concept of law is not correct mistakes。
（3）Actor known facts and actual fact don't agree is wrong, the person that judgment and objective law is law of illegal inconsistency errors.
These ideas basically could in theory and legal irrtumslehre fact distinguish mistakes, it is important to emphasize that：
1) With the conviction that the so-called irrelevant, as this mistake to hit each other, the shooting head caused the death of heart, without vision of research into our.
2) Study of the theory of error, error occurs when the purpose, but whether to intentionally resistance, rece plots affected only the wrong cognition, natural sentencing nor will it into the error theory category.
3) This does not constitute a crime and actor for crime, and for their behavior in the criminal law on the crimes and how to apply for criminal punishment on such specific knowledge error, conviction according to law. Based on this, the author thinks that, at the fact that criminal law is only to know wrong doer of elements to know the so-called objective facts constituents of mistake is the fact that the legal irrtumslehre error refers to the legal action is illegal and the evaluation of the mistake. From the theory of facts and legal irrtumslehre error, but the problem is in the law, criminal elements to the facts and law closely combined circumstances (like some administrative crimes and economic crimes), or is in a fact itself contains certain laws of evaluation content, to distinguish with a mistake is the fact that mistake or legal wrong, is often difficult. If the property of his humanity and obscenity obscenity, administrative rules and regulations, JinYuOu, disrupt public until its precondition of the legitimacy of the public, and legal irrtumslehre facts wrong intertwined, and this is what we distinguish facts and legal irrtumslehre errors will solve the problem.
In some cases, the defendant should know that because of the lack of knowledge, and not to the behavior of social harmfulness, so that the defendant is not "knowledge they will entail harmful consequences to society, and hope or allows such results" and deliberate crime, the burden of proof is only FanYi prosecution, in addition, prosecution without proof the defendant not normal, but normal mental and spiritual normal presumption defendant directly if the defendant that his spirit is not normal, it shall provide necessary evidence by himself to prove. Thus, the author, on legal irrtumslehre processing, can adopt the presumption of ways to handle. Which country presumption every normal citizens are known, unless the law can put forward defense "advantage prove" above, or the evidence rebut these presumption is established. From the efficiency of lawsuit, said the country is impossible to prove the defendant is known of the law.

㈢ 请问哪里能找到法学的英文论文十万火急，万分感谢！

JASTOR上可能有，在学校图书馆电子资料里
http://..com/question/7467879.html

㈣ 急急急！！法学论文摘要英文翻译，英语高手进

Abstract
Punitive damages is designed not only to compensate the victim completely but also to punish the offenders and deter them from similar behaviors. But when it is settled in our legal system and social surrounding, the above functions are unimportant and even impossible.
It is not salutary to establish a punitive system in proct liability of our country.
The punished guilty relevant regulations about procing, selling the fake and common procts of the Criminal Law includes both acts which result in proct liability and probably result in proct liability. So other laws have not to and should not punish persons who have these behaviors.
The enterprise who obtains the illegal sales amount that under 50,000 Yuan would be punished by the existing civil compensation system, for its loss which caused by compensating the victim subtracted from its gain is negative. Therefore our country present legal framework repels the punitive function of punitive damages.
Furthermore, by dint of the moral damages in the present civil compensatory system, the function of compensating completely could be performed. Obviously, constructing punitive damages to realize this function is not efficient.
In our country, punitive damages in contract responsibility mainly in the interest of consumer's benefits, but it is not successful. On one hand, because legislators traced the transact course insufficiently, the law can not protect consumer's benefit well; On the other hand, although the original intention of legislation is prevent fraud, it has encouraged another kind of fraud because of the unapt utilization.
In summary, considering our surroundings of law and economy, punitive damages should not build in the systems of proct liability and contract responsibility.

㈤ 法律英语论文的选题怎么选

法律英语即法律领域使用的英语,我国在处理国际法律事务中,需要借助法律英语,法律英语不同于其他英语,它需要注重逻辑性、缜密性、专业性,在具体使用过程中有许多注意事项.下面学术堂整理了二十个法律英语论文选题,供大家进行参考:

1、影响法律英语翻译的因素分析

2、我国法律英语教材编撰与出版探析

3、法律英语的冗余性及其翻译策略

4、法律英语术语误译

5、浅议法律法规绘本制作对高职旅游英语专业学生素质能力的培养

6、法律英语文本中的后修饰语歧义分析

7、英语法律语篇中的言语行为研究

8、法律英语教学中的自我效能感研究

9、大陆法系与英美法系的法律差异对法律英语翻译的影响

10、法律英语教学面临的问题

11、超学科视野下的法律英语教学研究

12、浅谈法律英语的词汇特征

13、结合理论浅谈法律英语的翻译

14、法律英语两个译名的译法商榷

15、高校法律英语教学的现状和对策

16、基于生态翻译学的法律英语翻译误译研究

17、法律英语中的隐喻研究及其汉译

18、浅析法律英语翻译的精确性与模糊性--以法律语言为视角

19、法美学何以为人学--从话语分析角度看法美学与法律英语翻译的关联

20、法律英语翻译中原文风格的再现--UCP600两个汉译本的对比研究

㈥ 英国法学论文的写作方法有哪些

关于英国法学论文的写作方法，具体如下：
一、法学论文概述
学术论文，也称学术理论文章。它是指在自然科学或社会科学领域内用来进行科学研究和描述科学研究成果的论文。法学学术论文，是指在法学领域中对某个学术理论问题进行专门的系统的科学研究，并且表述某些研究成果的论文。
(一)法学学术论文，一般说来应当具有如下几个特点：
1.学术性，即指论文对法学学术理论问题具有科学的论证性;
2.理论性，即指论文运用充分占有的材料，经过严密论证将法学中某个或某几个问题“升华”到理论高度，从而找出带规律性的东西的思辩性。
3.创造性，即指论文论述的法学问题“发前人所未发”，探求法学中前人没有发现的规律或匡正通说的独创性。
4.专业性，即指法学论文对法学学科中的某个或某几个专门问题进行研究，并取得一定成果，具有供法学专家、教授、学者研讨和交流的专业性。
(二)法学学术论文的主要要求是：
1.所研究和论述的法学问题，观点正确，对社会主义革命和法制建设有促进作用;
2.能推动法学领域学术理论的研究向前发展;
3.具有学术论文的诸特点;
4.全文观点与材料统一，层次分明，条理清楚;
5.论证中逻辑严密，推理正确;
6.所用的法学语言准确、概括、精炼;
7.文风庄重，就事论理，据理立说，以理创新。
二、法学论文选题
1.能确定研究方向。法学研究发展很快，门类繁多;法学中待研究的题目也不少。选定了某个题目，就确定了法学研究的方向和主攻目标。方向定得准，目标愈集中，写出来的法学学术论文成功的可能性就愈大。
2.能促进构思活动。法学学术论文写作是一种精神劳动。法学学术论文的写作是为获得法学研究成果而进行劳动的体现。它需要自己围绕学术论文的题目进行深思熟虑的和绞尽脑汁的构思和论证。选定一个好的法学论文题目，就能促进上述构思活动的深入顺利开展。

㈦ 法学 论文英文摘要翻译！！急急急

[digest] Domestic violence means the violence one party to another between family members in a family, including physical injury, mental damage and sexual violence. Domestic violence is an infringement towards personal right that breaks the law. Because domestic violence usually takes place in a family,the victims are often unable or unwilling to make it public. Further more, the society pays little attention to the domestic violence and the jurisdiction apartments seldom involves in it, all these make domestic violence are more convert, complicated and last for a long time. The reasons of domestic violence exists and becoming more and more are complicated. The traditional and feudal ideology, economic and social system and the victims themselves are all the reasons. Regarding to all of this, the writer emphasises on these problems and expect to lead more attention to focus on the domestic violence in Chinese families.

[key words] domestic violence, reason, solutions

㈧ 法学Essay写作引用可以使用哪几种格式

一篇法学essay往往是在大量文献引用和逻辑分析的基础上得出研究成果。在美国的法学论文中，单篇论文的引用文献往往都有上百个，我们甚至可能看到论文的引用部分所占有的篇幅甚至比正文还多。对于这种近乎疯狂的引用情怀，也遭到加拿大等其他国家法学家的讽刺（来自渥太华大学法学院优秀毕业生徐的转述）。然而，无论文献引用数量多少，我们需要做的基本功了解法学essay写作中的引用格式和引用规范。下面同学们就跟Meeloun小编一起来看看吧！
引用规范包括两个要求：一是对于参考借鉴必须注明出处，二是引用形式要统一
一、参考借鉴必须注明出处
在法学essay写作中，引用的功能主要包括三个方面：（1）帮助读者识别和调用相关文献资源：Help readers identify and relocate the source work。（2）证明论文的观点是经过充分研究得出的；Provide evidence that the position is well-researched。（3）尊重提出原观点、理论的作者：Give credit to the author of an original concept or theory presented。此外，在阅读一些论文的时候，我们经常看到一个引用泛化的现象，就是引用没有体现上述功能。例如，将学界通识引用为个别知名教授的观点，将一些基本事实、常识引用为个别文章的成果，等等。
二、引用形式要统一
引用形式要统一，是指引用的格式必须按照标准化的要求做到全文统一，并遵循有关要求。在英文论文写作中，引用的格式有多种参考标准。在Google Scholar检索中自动生成的Citation形式里面，就有MLA、APA和GB/T 7714三种可选，其中第三个是中国国家标准化管理委员会发布的国家标准《文后参考文献著录规则》，在国内高校的毕业论文引用规范和理工科学术期刊中采用较多。此外，国际标准化组织（ISO）还发布了文献引用格式的国际标准ISO 690:2010（Information and documentation--Guidelines for bibliographic references and citations to information resources），致力于推动文献引用格式的国际协调一致。文献引用格式的标准化，有利于促进文献数据的信息化处理，进而服务于学术影响力评价等诸多方面。
目前，各种类型文献引用规范都是推荐性的。各个研究机构、学术期刊往往会根据本领域文献的特征，选择其中一种或者自创一种格式作为采用格式。在法学essay引用格式中，以《哈佛法律评论》等为主的期刊联盟就自行制定了文献引用体系的蓝皮书，也即The Bluebook，该引用格式目前是英文世界法学文献的主流引用格式。此外，APA、Martin也被诸多法学研究机构和学术期刊采用，故此，本文就分别介绍一下The Bluebook、APA、Martin的基本情况。
1.The Bluebook文献引用格式
The Bluebook的英文全称为The Bluebook:A Uniform System of Citation，中文全称为《蓝皮书：统一注释体系》。在使用过程中，一般直接称为蓝皮书（The Bluebook），它是一本在美国使用最为广泛的法律引用指南。蓝皮书是由《哈佛法律评论》、《哥伦比亚法律评论》、《宾夕法尼亚法律评论》、《耶鲁法律评论》的编委会共同参与编写。蓝皮书第一版出版于1926年，现在已经出到了第二十版。蓝皮书是美国绝大多数法学院进行引用时参考的指南，也是美国绝大多数联邦法院使用的引用格式。当然，美国最高法院有自己的引用格式，每个州在自己的法院系统里也只遵守自己制定的引用格式。
The Bluebook全书共计560页，详细的列举了各类文献的引用形式。在书中，你可以看到中文文献的英文引用方式，也可以看到同一本文献的多种引用形式。在每一类文献的引用规范中，The Bluebook列举了许多中不同情况、不同形式的引用形式，供读者自己选择。例如，对于著作，他列举了一个作者、两个作者、三个作者以上的不同引用形式，同时对于一个作者的著作又列举了不同引用形式，供读者自行选择适用。在期刊论文、电子文献等其他各类资源下，也尽可能穷尽各种形式进行举例说明。
The Bluebook的详尽引用规范，一方面得到大网络全书的赞誉，另外也因为其过于繁杂而饱受了许多批评。例如，芝加哥大学直接将蓝皮书简化改版为Maroonbook，以增加适用的便利性。总而言之，The Bluebook是法学论文写作的必备书，但是并不需要使用者全文阅读，而仅仅是在需要使用的时候查看。尤其对于其他引用规范没有提到的偏门文献，The Bluebook往往也可以让你查到其引用形式。
The Bluebook虽然是必备必备工具书，但是其并未免费向社会提供，使用者必须用真金实银去购买方可获得。在The Bluebook发行的最初50年，该书的版权收益一直由《哈佛法律评论》100%占有，《哥伦比亚法律评论》、《宾夕法尼亚法律评论》、《耶鲁法律评论》到1974年时才意识到这一问题。最终经过争论，《哈佛法律评论》分享40%收益，另外三家各分享20%的收益，《哈佛法律评论》负责生产和销售。另外，记得在中国政法大学中欧法学院的课程中，讲授Legal Research and Writing的美国教授曾经专门向TheBluebook版权方询问，是否可以授权免费复印40余本用于教学。The Bluebook的版权方明确回答，必须付费方可使用，最后由学校付费才取得复印数十本的权利。在Amazon，目前第20版的The Bluebook售价32美元左右。The Bluebook的电子版在网上无法免费获得。对于其他途径获取电子版或复印版，各位可以根据著作权法的合理使用规则自行处理。
2.APA文献引用格式
APA格式英文全称为Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association，即《美国心理协会刊物准则》。它是美国心理协会（American Psychological Association）出版的，在包括法学在内的各个社会科学领域内广泛采用的文献引用规范。APA格式起源于1929年，当时只有7页，被刊登在《心理学期刊（Psychological Bulletin）》。目前，APA已出版至第六版（ISBN 9781433805615），总页数272页。
在APA格式中，引注没有The Bluebook那么复杂，其采用的引用格式也比较容易被读者记下和掌握。但是，APA对于法学论文中常见的案例引用等特殊情况，没有作出说明，由此导致采用APA格式的法学论文都需要再配合The Bluebook使用。
为了对APA格式有直观了解，举例如下：
纸质著作：Finney,J.(1970).Time and again.New York,NY:Simon andSchuster.
纸质期刊论文：Nevin,A.(1990).The changing of teacher ecation special ecation.Teacher Ecation and Special Ecation:The Journal of the Teacher Ecation Division of the Council for Exceptional Children,13(3-4),147-148
APA的第6版还特别新增了Kindle电子版图书的引用规范，例如：Eggers,D.(2008).The circle[KindleVersion].
APA格式也是受到著作权保护的作品，其售价为15美元左右。同时，在Google上可以检索到该书第6版的电子版。
3.Martin文献引用格式
Martin格式的英文全名是Introction to Basic Legal Citation，即《基本法律引用指引》。它是由康奈尔大学法学院前院长Peter W.Martin教授创作完成。Martin格式最初诞生于1993年，在2016年做了最新修订，共计500页。该格式比The Bluebook简单易懂，同时还补充了APA格式对于法学论文引用的不足。此外，Martin格式的由作者通过互联网免费向社会公开使用，可以不受纸质版出版周期限制而作出及时的修订。
在Martin格式的第一章，其全面总结了主要的文献引用形式，并做了详细的讲解。因此，对于初学者来说，直接看Martin格式的第一章就可以比较全面的掌握英文文献引用的基本技巧。
总结
各类引用格式规范提供了多种参考格式，在没有其他要求的情况下，同学们只需要保障文中前后一致即可。此外，上述英文引用格式是写作英文论文所需要掌握和运用的。希望同学们都能掌握以上的法学essay的引用格式哦！回答来源于Meeloun，原文链接

㈨ 毕业论文(法学)英文摘要翻译!!请高手帮忙!!高分在线等...

Our country in the foreign contract's law is suitable the aspect to make the law with the world to be the same general, mainly has established two principles, namely meaning autonomous principle and closest relation principle, but compares with the related international convention and other country's legislation, in our country existing legislation the related foreign contract law suitable stipulation existence sense of principle is too strong, and lacks the feasibility insufficiency, thus needs to further consummate to it.

㈩ 急求一篇关于法学知识的英语论文。最好加上英语句子翻译！谢谢啦~

你这篇中国知网也好
万方数据也好都有例子！
甚至网络文库都有！
==================论文写作方法===========================
论文网上没有免费的，与其花人民币，还不如自己写，万一碰到骗人的，就...【每天都有】
写作论文的简单方法，首先大概确定自己的选题，然后在网上查找几份类似的文章!
通读类似的文章，对这方面的内容有个大概的了解！
参照论文的格式，列出提纲，补充内容，实在不会，把这几份论文综合一下
从每篇论文上复制一部分，组成一篇新的文章！
然后把按自己的语言把每一部分换下句式或词，经过换词不换意的办法处理后,网上就查不到了
祝你顺利完成论文!