法律英语中国公司法

❶ 学习法律英语的网站

推荐两个实用的法律英语学习微信公众号：
一个是“LEC法律英语考试资讯”：这个平台分享LEC考试的最新动态，更重要的是，推送很多法律英语知识，还有真题解析。
第二个是“法律英语教学与测试”：这个平台推送的文章偏学术性，是系统了解美国法律的不错资源。

❷ 法律英语翻译

对于这些原则来说存在着一些例外。比如：在特殊的环境下，股东可能需要在其持股范围之外承担一定的个人责任。贷方可能会要求股东为公司提供个人担保，以延长公司的贷款期限。同时，在一些组织紧密的公司里，股东会同意继续经营，因此会受到股票变现的限制。

之所以设计这种股东受限债务规则，是为了保护法人债权人的利益。比方说，设立者可以只是遵循成文法所规定的程序来设立一家公司，而这些法令规定了一家公司得以存续的条件。同样的，公司的财产要受到这些保护债权人规则的支配和限制。所以，公司法一般会规定设立公司所需要向公司注入的最低限度的资本，而每一股东都向公司注入一定的资产，从而获得分红的资格。因此，在公司盈余已不足规定的最低限额资本时，股东是不能从公司经营中分红的。

❸ 学习法律英语，哪里找法条官方译文

http://www.npc.gov.cn/englishnpc/Law/Frameset-index.html
全国人大的官网

❹ 法律英语

您既然是英语专业的同学，优势自不必说。劣势在于对于法律体系不熟悉。“想往法律英语翻译之类的方向发展”的话，个人觉得必须熟稔法律，然后才能得心应手，所以“在法律英语的教材选择应充分考虑到法律英语是专业英语以及中国法律体系属于大陆法系的特点。从文体来讲，应包括法律条文、法律著作、法庭审理与辩护、司法文书写作以及案例分析等；从内容与结构来讲，应依次包括法律英语语言特点的分析及法律英语的中英互译技巧、英美法系与大陆法系的比较、英美律师职业介绍、英美主要部门法、国际经贸法律以及中国基本法律制度等。”
推荐课外阅读材料

教材类：
1．沙丽金：《研究生英语教程——法律英语分册》，中国政法大学出版社，2001。
2．何家弘：《法律英语》，法律出版社，2003年4月第一版。
3．齐筠： 《法律英语》，高等教育出版社，2005年。
4．董世忠、赵建：《法律英语》，复旦大学出版社，1997。
5．陈庆柏：《涉外经济法律英语》，法律出版社，1995。
6．杜金榜、张新红：《法律英语核心教程》，对外经济贸易大学出版社，2002。
7．陈莉萍，专门用途英语研究[M]. 上海：复旦大学出版社,2000。
8．杨颖浩，略论英美法律语言中的求同型近义词，上海科技翻译，1998，（4）。

专著类：
1. 孟德斯鸠，《论法的精神》，北京:商务印书馆,2004年版

梅因，《古代法》，北京:商务印书馆,1996年版
伯纳德•施瓦茨，《美国法律史》，中国政法大学出版社，1990年版
4. [法]达维德，《当代主要法律体系》，漆竹生译，上海译文出版社1984年版

邵景春著《欧洲联盟的法律与制度》，人民法院出版社，1999年版
郭成伟著《外国法系精神》，北京: 中国政法大学出版社,2001版
[德]马迪亚斯·赫蒂根著《欧洲法》（张恩民译），法律出版社，2003年版
8. 潘维大等编:《英美法导读》,法律出版社2000年版

9. 潘国和, 《中外法学教育比较研究》,上海:华东师范大学出版社,1992年版

10. 戴维•S•克拉克，《美国法律概论》，中信出版社，2003年版

11. 麦高伟，杰弗里•威尔逊，《英国刑事司法程序》，法律出版社，2003年版

12. 麦克尔•H•格莱姆，《联邦证据法》（美国法精要），法律出版社，1999年版

13. 卞建林等，《外国刑事诉讼法》，人民法院出版社/中国社会科学出版社，2002年版

14. 杰罗德•H•以兹瑞等，《刑事程序法》（美国法精要），法律出版社，1999年版

15. 《民事程序法》（美国法精要），法律出版社，1999年版

16. 《侵权法》（美国法精要），法律出版社，1999年版

17. 克劳德•D•柔沃，乔登•D•沙博，《合同法》（美国法精要），法律出版社，1999年版

18. 罗伯特•W•汉密尔顿，《公司法》（美国法精要），法律出版社，1999年版

原版参考书：

1. Debra S. Lee, American Legal English, University of Michigan Press, 1999.
2. G. Gunther, Cases and Marterials on Constitutional Law, 1975.
3．Mark W. Janis, An Introction to International Law, Aspen Publishers, 2003
4．John Rawls, A Theory of Justice, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971.

5. John Makdisi, Introction to the Study of Law, Cincinnati: Anderson Publishing Co., 1990.

6. William Burnham, Introction to the Law and Legal System of the United States, 3rd Edition, West Group, 2002

❺ 法律英语翻译（中文翻译成英文）

The new company law of our company is the new milestone, the legislation of one-person company name is much, but the new "law of one-man company system design also regret. The most obvious defects is only specified lawmakers established the legal status of one-man company, but did not make clear the legal status of one-man company, and the emperor l degrees between them. This paper is intended to clarify the surviving theoretically the necessity of establishing one company law and its characteristics of the perfect company some Suggestions. On January 1, 2006, the new company law formally implement system of one-man company, is a formal establishment method, the debate over a long time, finally in our company legislation has been clear. This is our company LiFaShi the progress, but the new "law of one-man company system design also regret. The most obvious defects is only specified lawmakers established the legal status of one-man company, but did not make clear the legal status of one-man company, and between the two systems. It will be on the actual operation of the "law of cause trouble. This paper is intended to clarify the surviving theoretically the necessity of establishing one company and the legal characteristics, and the improvement of the law of some Suggestions.
The first part of the surviving company mainly discussed the basic theoretical analysis.
The second section describes all of one company legislation and comments.
The third part of the existence of law of one-man company to stand.

❻ 法律英语在线翻译，在线急等啊！！ [摘要] 晚清《公司律》问世于20世纪初期，是我国历史上第一部明确的公

The company law of the late qing dynasty made in the 20th century, china's history is the first part of corporate law, for the development of our company legislation laid the foundation of our legal system, is the modernization of the beginning. the company law of the late qing dynasty period of late qing dynasty issued to private factories to set up a company providing legal basis for the protection of the rights, promoting national instry developed rapidly and our company progress in legislation have a positive impetus to, but owing to the company law of china's multinational rulemaking

❼ 法律英语高手 翻译 谢谢·

我去

❽ 法律英语高手请进，高分求公司法英语翻译（三）

(C) Company on behalf of the right to special circumstances

Germany "shares the Company Law," Article 112 provides that in relation to members of the Board, the Board of Supervisors in court on behalf of the company and outside. "The Japanese Commercial Code," Article 175-4 and the "Special Law of Commercial Law" section of the provisions of Article 24-25, in the company's directors, or directors of the company when the proceedings on behalf of the company supervisors can. Chinese "Company Law" Article 54 of the directors, senior management officer in the execution of corporate ties in violation of laws and administrative regulations or the provisions of the Articles of Association, to the company damage that can be directors, senior management proceedings.

(Iv) operational implementation of negates the right to

Means that when the Board of Supervisors found that the company's operational activities illegal live damage the interests of the company, the power to pass relevant personnel to stop their behavior. "The Japanese Commercial Code," Article 275 bis, as director of corporate purposes is not within the scope of the acts, or other illegal act or acts of the statute, the company has a significant risk of harm, the Ombudsman may request the cessation of acts of directors . Germany, China has given to the board of supervisors of the terms of the statute.

(E) the right of shareholders to convene the General Assembly

When the board of directors could not be convened, or just an effect of the General Assembly to convene the shareholders, the board of supervisors may convene general meeting of shareholders. Germany "shares the Company Law," Article 111 provides that if the company required benefits, the board of supervisors shall convene general meeting of shareholders. "The Japanese Commercial Code" section 131 require that a general meeting convened by the Board decision, but the provisions of this Act or the Articles of Association, except by the Board of Supervisors convened. . Chinese "Company Law" Article 54 provides that the board of directors and supervisors do not fulfill the provisions of this law will be convened and presided over the meeting of shareholders convened and presided over ties provisional shareholders meeting;

(Vi) company the right to know

Companies the right to know the operation of the board of supervisors are the premise of performing its monitoring function. "The Japanese Commercial Code," Article 260 provides for 3 of the Board of Supervisors and the views of the right to attend the right of submission. Germany, "shares company law" provisions of the board of directors of the board of supervisors have an obligation to report regularly on the company's future operational implementation of business policy, for-profit, business and other matters progress. Chinese Company Law does not require this.

❾ 法律英语高手请进，高分求公司法英语翻译（四）

三. Chinese defects exist board of supervisors system and its perfect
(A) the company board of supervisors system deficiencies exist
In 2005, the Chinese the "Company Law" concted a thorough amendment, introced a lot of other civil law countries the best system, the board of supervisors system also must be perfect, but through the above-mentioned civil law system of internal supervisors contrast, can be found Chinese board of supervisors system still exist some deficiencies in the following:
1. Chinese companies to the board of supervisors and even the loss of the independence of the independence of the weaker
Chinese "Company Law" provisions of the company's directors, managers and financial responsible person should not act as supervisors, this provision is undoubtedly correct. Actual situation, however, members of the board of supervisors and board members have resial superior-subordinate relationship, especially state-owned enterprises are the original company, chairman of the board is often the original enterprise party secretary, the board of supervisors is chaired by the Chairman of Commission for Discipline Inspection, secretary or trade unions, which kinds of resial effects of a superior-subordinate relationship of the Board of Supervisors can only play; Chinese Company Law in support of the majority shareholders control the election of the board of supervisors, board of supervisors by the shareholders attending the meeting by the General Assembly of shareholders held more than half of the voting rights arising from the adoption of the majority shareholders can control supervisors of elections, in order to make their own or their agents to become supervisors, board of supervisors do not have independence. Trade union representative to sit on the board of supervisors, their payroll, job decision by general manager, when faced with other supervisors oversee the object of his dismissal of the dangers, how to assume ties of supervision? At this point does not have the independence of supervisors.
2. The board of supervisors improve the quality of personnel to be
The company's operating behavior generally involve financial, auditing, and legal expertise, the board of supervisors to be able to exert effective oversight function, it must have the relevant professionals, the quality of supervisors should have the corresponding requirements. And Chinese companies in the establishment of the board of supervisors did not review the supervisors Strict qualifications, the corporate charter and few qualified supervisors to determine the consideration process.
3. The board of supervisors the authority is too small
And Germany, Japan, the board of supervisors system, the supervisory board of China's lack of a number of important powers:
⑴ supervisors does not confer the right to internal oversight. The supervision of the board of supervisors objects are all located on the board of supervisors of the people and things outside, but under the supervision of their own, this is not concive to the board of supervisors of the honesty and self-discipline and the common progress of supervisors, workers and supervisors in the Supervisory Board's position, how to exercise their functions and powers; workers and supervisors shareholders supervisors happened differences on specific issues, how to resolve and so on.
⑵ supervisors proposed the convening of the shareholders meeting, did not provide the board of directors does not convene at the time of relief measures.
⑶ not given to the operation of the board of supervisors of the company's right to know.
4. The lack of supervisors of the incentive and restraint mechanisms
Chinese "Company Law" section 148 generally provides that "supervisors should comply with laws and administrative regulations and articles of incorporation, the company has a ty of loyalty and diligence obligations", although in the old method based on the increased lot of prohibitions, it is still a lack of incentives mechanism, without in order to mobilize the enthusiasm of Supervisors; because of the board of supervisors meeting to take a collective decision-making style, this held accountable manner without the specific proceres may not be able to implement the responsibility of indivials, bound by a mechanism could be implemented. The ty of loyalty, confidentiality and other obligations if not fulfilled, if not assume liability would give rise to be removed from office, as well as the removal of specific proceres, such as how to not make any provisions.
Outside the 300 years of the company's practice management system for the functional design of the board of supervisors has accumulated substantial experience. Although the board of supervisors system should not entirely rule out the illegal operators, but its effectiveness should be affirmative. In recent years in Germany and Japan, the United States and other countries the company's internal oversight mechanisms and explore the adjustment also reflects the international trend. China only on the basis of the needs of economic development, company law legislation in response to the above inadequacies of Supervisors (will) improve the system before the socialist market economy can guarantee the smooth development.